• commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve defaulted to ddg for like 2 years now. Solid. Good enough. Really what happened is that SEO optomization websites even before the AI craze made Google search so awful that ddg became just as good if not better for me than google

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Google literally redesigned their search engine to be worse so that you would scroll through more ads to find the results you want. On average, the best result now is the fifteenth result.

      • edgesmash@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        That’s what happens when the engineers are forced out and the marketers are given control.

  • Yliaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    DDG isn’t the holy grail people make it out to be; it has contracts with Microsoft and we all know how Microslop likes AI.

    • Sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No, they’re not, but they are one of the better-known alternatives to Google, and they do advocate privacy. This, in itself, is a good thing and should be promoted.

      The problem is that Google’s monopoly on web search is so large that using Google is the de facto standard for the vast majority of people. Getting them to acknowledge that there are alternatives to Google benefits privacy on the internet more than DDG having contracts with MS harms it.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    For what it’s worth, DDG recognized this immediately.

    They dipped their toe in AI search, felt the pushback, and went all-in on putting toggles and immediately accessible opt-outs everywhere. They put a filter for AI images (and I hope they do the same for AI SEO spam).

    In other words, they actually leaned in and listened to their own users. Unlike the soulless vampire on a throne Google has become.

    • WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      While I do appreciate this, their search results aren’t great. I hate to say this, but even with horrible AI forward results, Google still returns better and more relevant results. I’ll still use ddg first but it generally leaves me wanting.

      • YawningNostalgia@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Usually if I search anything seriously, like for work, I use journals that require a subscription that I access through my institution. If I’m trying to find a funny meme, that’s different. Google is fine for the casual stuff, but since I just don’t like them DuckDuckGo seems like an acceptable alternative even though I’ve found it slightly less effective.

    • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      While their first party browser convinced me if it’s privacy capabilities, I need extensions (yes, recognizing that makes me much more fingerprintable) so I use their browser less than 1% of the time.

      However, I have subscribed for their premium Services because I already trust their anti-tracker on my mobile devices and they have sufficient number of VPN nodes to be useful to me (I do miss Mullvad, and probably will use them when I’m traveling International, but it is getting harder to find good nodes and they don’t have servers in south Korea at all, either).

      And their measures to make a neutered and neutral AI interface is the first time I’ve ever paid for general AI access, finding it’s helped some of my efforts as AI has been a necessary component for building my home studio and mini rack. I’m scared that my brain has already been ruined, acclimating to Google’s integration of Bard and then later Gemini, and I make a regular exercise of hunting for sites that have articles or discussions that will help me work through tech projects and puzzles “the hard way” with just vanilla search queries and amendments.

      I love that DDG’s tech stack seems to play well in the general broader ecosystem, so it’s my search engine of choice for all of my Gecko/Fusion browsers (Fennec, WaterFox, LibreWolf, and occasionally, full-fat vanilla Firefox).

      I had really thought I could grow into using Kagi but I couldn’t make it make sense for myself. When you’re limiting paid subscribers at the first tier to 300 general web queries a month, and i could consume that many just on correcting my own typos and re-searches alone, DDG was a better investment for me for the time being.

      TL;DR - I love that these guys play well with others, so I’ll even pay for the access because I need them to still exist in a decade.

        • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          56 minutes ago

          It’s more than enough some types, but I agree, probably not the average lemmy user. I’m happy enough with their search results to pay for a higher tier.

  • escapedgoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I use DuckDuckGo as my primary search engine and have for a while. But I have noticed lately that every time I search for something, it almost always only returns product pages. I don’t know if this is effective SEO or a way of DDG monetizing their search. But unfortunately I’ve been looking for alternatives just because it’s so frustrating when searching for information to get nothing back but a bunch of sites trying to sell you their product.

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Yeah I’m not a big fan of DDG either… it’s powered by Bing so hardly surprising it isn’t great. And Microsoft isn’t any less evil than Google.

      Presearch is the best I’ve found - just a nice, basic search - but it’s a little slow and has some cryptoshit background so I’m open to alternatives. Ecosia is greenwashing bullshit afaik.

        • 7101334@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          It literally has an AI function lmao

          The environmental search engine has an environment-killing function that no one needs. They also partner with Google and Microsoft, both avid environment-murderers.

          But yeah sure bro, plant a few trees, that’ll offset everything I’m sure.

          And their search results are powered by Bing, so it won’t be any better than DDG anyway.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Until real Americans take their country back from the corrupt pedophile protecting “administration”, I’ll mostly avoid US search engines altogether.

    • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Those who enable and finance the pedophiles are international… they won’t disappear when Trump dies, they have old money and are multigenerational. Trump is just a stooge for international interests, like Epstein was.

      See Deutsch Bank, for example… they financed Trump with billions of dollars, and broke the law to do so. Without them, Trump would not be President today.

      Also, look at the funders of organizations like The Heritage Foundation; coincidentally, many members are shared between them and the Council on Foreign Relations. All of this will remain when Trump is gone.

      • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        They’re also looking forward to a less corrupt, more trustworthy administration. Greater reliability leads to more investments. You know that.

  • DiaDeLosMuertos@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’ve been quite happy to use the AI stuff actually. I’ve asked lots of random questions and within seconds it comes up with answers. Jesus should we go back to having to type in the specific web address to find everything !?

    http/:www.whatdhfuckamitypingallthisoutfor?

    Each to their own. Go in peace.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It doesn’t matter how fast it is if the answer is wrong, and it does seem to be wrong an awful lot. I will check their citations to see if they back up their output, and many times they do not.

      Jesus should we go back to having to type in the specific web address to find everything !?

      http/:www.whatdhfuckamitypingallthisoutfor?

      Uh, no? Just use a search engine? You remember those, right?

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        60 minutes ago

        AI in Google reminds me of browser ads back in the day, something that became more and more intrusive until I made an effort to block it. I got into a bad habit of reading the AI answer, then having to remind myself that it was just words thrown together using probability which is why it was wrong so often. I tend to search for obscure things that the AI has limited exposure to, and it will make shit up rather than admit it can’t find something.

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Jesus should we go back to having to type in the specific web address to find everything !?

      Yes, you should inconvenience yourself with the weighty first-world burden of having to press a few buttons for access to the full library of mankind’s knowledge in order to avoid using a product which is inherently destructive to the one and only planet currently available for our species to inhabit.

      Hope that helps. Fuck peace, go in love, including the love of a mother bear to destroy what threatens those she loves.

    • pogmommy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You probably don’t remember since you’ve been eating glue at an LLM’s advice, but search engines have existed for a while, and even worked at one point!

      • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The thing about THAT is Bing built their house literally copying Google’s homework. In the early days (maybe 2013? Long before they went masks-off) google published examples of them inventing new unique words that didn’t organizational exist in open web pages, and those popping up and Bing search indexes 3 weeks later.

        Kagi, at least according to a few talks Doctorow of the EFF gave in recent history, admit their indices just came from Google’s as well.

        Watching everyone’s favorite advertising agency turn heal so swiftly has been one of the biggest bummers of my adult life.

  • kalpol@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Its not crazy hard to install your own searxng instance. Works pretty well. The problem is that the Internet itself is turning into AI slop.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Dude I don’t even know what that is or what it does and I’m pretty sure most people don’t either. It might be easy but what the heck even is it?

      • vodka@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It let’s you have one search website where you have it pull results from all other search engines (that you want) and then it can rank results based on where things rank on the various engines.

        Tl;dr self hosted search proxy, with some advanced features

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The problem with your own searxng instance is that your searches across other engines come from your IP address.

      So if you’re searching for something, everyone knows it’s you using IP triangulation. Google then tracks you around the internet.

      If that doesnt bother you, OK great.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Last time I tried I had issues but it was quite a while ago. Do you know a good guide or something you can post?

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I have it installed in a docker container in Linux both as a search 3ngine for my local AI setup, and for regular browsing.

      Setup and installation is a great use case for AI.

      Go to Google gemini, and ask it to create a step by step guide to install a container with searxng, and how to allow searches from your browser(s). Make sure you tell gemini that you are a simple user, not a power user, so it shouldn’t assume anything. Also ask it to make sure it shows you how to make the container autostart with the pc. Tell gemini that you want this in a step by step tutorial.

      Should make it easy, as you can ask questions if you get stuck, or something doesn’t work.

    • orlyowl@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There’s a DDG privacy first browser on Android. This is probably what they are referring to.

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      We’ve come full-circle. I used to download .html pages so I could browse them while offline. Now websites install themselves so they can browse you while offline.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I thought it meant changing your default search engine.

      I never considered that it was an app.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Too many people are brain hostages to the idea that apps do everything and you need an app for everything, even though most of the things are just websites. But all the apps are really doing is spying while they deliver their version of the website.

      • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I bought a literal thermometer, not a thermostat just a thermometer, which I wanted to log temperatures, and it insisted on me downloading an app and then setting up a free account. Noped out of that s*** and left caustic reviews but it was impossible to use without a smart device, without internet access, and without the invasion of privacy.

        Just repeat that story a hundred times and you’re describing modern domestic life.

    • Coriza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I “love” when the wrong technology is applied.

      On the the dawn of the smartphones Mozilla tried to enter the space with an FirefoxOS and the pitch was that every app was just a website just more tightly integrated with the phone. The problem is that all the web stack is wonderfully resource hog and at the time phones were super underpowered running websites were not optimized in a browser that were not as optimized as today. So it was a terrible choice for the time being.

      Other good one was Android early days. They choose Java as the default app environment and development. It kinda makes sense to use it if you want the same program to run on different platforms, the problem, again, it runs worst and with the underpowered devices of the time everything was a slog. And they doubled down on the mistake by using a garbage collector that doubled the memory usage of every app. The cherry on top, at least in hindsight is that arm was and still is the de facto Android plataform, greatly disminishing the advantage of using Java/JVM. And today Google enabled apps with native code optimized for specific plataforms, but everyone only care about ARM so of you try to run Android like in an Intel laptop a lot of apps are not compatible.

      End of rant.

      • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Hey dude, just wanted to say that I learned a little bit from you today. Thanks for sharing on here.

        I remember Apple famously disallowing any kind of “Write Once, Run Anywhere” platform tech at the dawn of iOS, ATVos and iPad OS, quite openly trying to fuck with Adobe’s and Sun’s shit.

        But using apps to avoid needing all of the traffic and rendering capabilities for modern websites was key in its early days and I remember even 10 years ago recommending to clients and customers that were stuck with awful internet connections or underpowered devices, to try using the apps instead of the websites for things.

        Nowadays, I only want to visit so many corpo resources strictly through a browser and fighting tooth and nail to avoid ever letting their apps on my phones. I would literally fire a bank for not having a functional Web page to do what I need done , especially since I probably can’t be on vanilla android for much longer the way things are going and too many secure apps require Google Play services for their circle of trust.

  • TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    yep, me too. you can put “-ai” at the end of your search to shut off the slop, but it’s a PITA. Often I’ll just go to DDG.