For example: in Canada, the bank accounts of those who protested were literally frozen (for simply speaking out or being critical) and talks of potential CBDCs (aka. used to deduct funds from one’s account as a fine) whilst considering on abolishing cash altogether.

The alternative (for now at least) may be Crypto (online) until they consider that “illegal” in the future penalizing those who are using it, framing that as money laundering or tax evasion, whilst pushing their propaganda of “tap & go is safe & convenient”.

The answers are divided between:

  • “Cash is King” (it allows anonymous or “private” transactions between you and the merchant)
  • “Contactless” (convenient, but your purchases & transactions are monitored by the state)

Cash is apparently the last bastion of “anonymous” transactions where it doesn’t appear on one’s statement and one gets to keep their money without the state deducting it from their account since a nation’s central bank has monopoly over CBDCs and one’s funds.

That’s not even the end of it: them trying to make BTC or equivalent illegal by making CBDCs the default replacing gold overnight, it would mean all those bills you have are worthless. At this point, the only payment method is CBDCs that are linked to one’s digital ID.

  • nile_istic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I know we’re meant to be discussing this from a privacy perspective, but my first thought whenever the topic of eliminating cash comes up is that, at least where I am in the US, it’s tantamount to euthanizing the homeless. The vast majority of unhoused folks I know (which is a lot, including myself for a terrible but thankfully short period of my life) get most of their necessities (particularly food) by buying them with cash they’ve earned through various means, rather than charities, food banks, soup kitchens, etc. And only a very small percentage of them has any sort of bank account and/or a device to manage digital currency.

    But also privacy, yes. Cash is king.

    • Butterphinger@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      34 minutes ago

      Interesting…

      currently saving and not trusting banks or crypto the most rn, metals might… be the way to go. My big curiosity has been who to buy from, I never just considered ebay.

  • monovergent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    For sure, even if it’s not perfect. Ready-to-use without electricity or internet, no payment processor shenanigans, and not nearly as comprehensive a system of tracking even if you account for serial numbers.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Cash is not 100% anonymous though. Vendors see you, cameras record you, you may even have to sign and present id for some transactions.

  • eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    US recently introduced the bright idea of banknote serial numbers blacklists. Great incentive to hold greenbacks!

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That’s at government’s discretion. E.g. they might decide to increase the velocity of money, by causing it to expire. The point is that they can render your cash invalid, with no recourse.

  • Ardens@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Cash is king. Always use cash when possible. I do, and I love it…

  • Lutra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why is this a question?

    “Should people be allowed to keep their rights?” – this is usually intended to spark discussion, but discussing from this pov helps those who want bad things more than those who dont.

    • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Because some people have a tendency to question the validity of things that don’t make sense to them. I could see someone asking, “why even have physical money anymore when everyone uses banking or credit?”

      The same deal with privacy, “why should I worry about internet privacy if I have done no wrong and have nothing to hide?” There are always people left out and harmed in pursuit of some form of purisim like those lines of thought.

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only private alternative to cash that im aware of is monero. Nothing else is as private as cash.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It is not the anonymity that is important.

    It is not having to ask someone permission to spend money like with a debit card, credit card, and even fucking crypto need institutional permission to have access to your power to spend yo money.

    anonymity ain’t shit.

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not even just permission, especially given most of these systems are made to operate on your phone rather than through a physical card.

      Oops, your phone died? Sorry, no groceries for you! Did your internet connection stop working on your phone? Sooooooooooorry, you’re not gonna be able to pay your bus fare.

        • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Most can, but they still rely on your phone getting an internet connection later, on your phone being trusted to send data over itself, and of course still require your phone to actually be charged. (Can change if it’s a regular card depending on the issuer though)

          Also, if you’re just generally curious about stuff related to offline payments, there’s actually a major security hole that Visa refuses to fix, which allows a device to pretend to be an offline-only card reader, then charge any value to someone’s card, and get away with it, even if their device is locked.

          Not really a point in favor of my original argument though, since CBDC infrastructure would require replacing or updating all the readers anyways, and implementing the standards to prevent such an attack, like MasterCard has used for a while now.

      • BillMangionee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is way less of an issue then your making it out to be. In 2026, when is your phone running out of battery or losing wifi?

        You can also just get a crypto card if your worried about your phone being unreliable. Its still permissioned, but you’re not buying shit on the street with direct crypto transfers anyway (at-least in the West, outside of crypto enthusiast merchants/restaurants).

        • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          In 2026, when is your phone running out of battery

          Not too regularly to me, but it happens frequently to most of my friends, and some street performers I know who don’t always have good access to a power outlet, or the money for a portable charger.

          …or losing wifi?

          I and many other people regularly experience complete cell dropouts when at my local grocery store. No service. (Works fine outside and slightly down the block) We are in a city, not the middle of nowhere either.

          There have also been internet dropouts for my local store’s machines, meaning people paying with cash could go instantly, whereas people who only had cards or phone payments had to wait in a massive line since every transaction took 2 minutes to go through.

          You can also just get a crypto card if your worried about your phone being unreliable.

          Sure, but at that point I could just get literally any card. I was only commenting on CBDCs, though I suppose the same critiques could apply to direct crypto transfers.

          At the end of the day, CBDCs tend to rely on phones to work, and thus can’t work if your phone doesn’t, unlike cards, and especially unlike cash. (given cash relies on nothing but you and the person you’re transacting with believing the cash is real, vs phone payments or even just cards still requiring an internet connection at some point, and power to the reader, plus permission from an external gatekeeper as the cherry on top)

          • swelter_spark@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, both of those things happen to me on a regular basis. If I’m using my phone, it might only last a few hours into the day.

          • BillMangionee@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I know the OP asked the hypothetical, but CBDC’s don’t have to replace cash altogether. Also, a CBDC account can be tied to a card. It doesn’t necessarily have to be solely internet-based in principle either.

            To your points about internet connectivity: I get it, but most people and merchants are using credit card terminals or tap-to-pay at this point anyway. Even in these rare scenarios where the merchant lost connectivity, you could still send the money over to the person on your battery powered phone with a digital transfer.

            My point is that you as an end-user won’t notice much change if the federal government were to transfer their treasury systems to a national blockchain instead of centralized servers and payments via VISA. The issue is in the implementation, and I’m almost certain they will fuck it up and/or have some shady company (re)build it.

    • Xirup@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      As Metallica said, sad but true. Ok, you have all your money in your bank account, but those are literally just 0 and 1s, our economy depends literally in non tangible numbers, and that’s it. And you cannot pay unless the bank explicitly allow it, so your "money’ isn’t your money now.

    • SkyeLight@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Especially with things like cyberattacks (institution losing access to your accounts), scamming (you lose access to your accounts), power failures (everyone loses access to their accounts), etc.

      I mean, I literally have a small stash of money in the closet (some 20’s and a bunch of smaller notes), so that if a semi-major disaster hits, I can still buy any supplies I can find that I need - gas, water, food, a couple nights in a hotel, whatever. Plastic is a great backup system, but it relies on me having my card, my card having enough money free, the merchant having power to run the card, the merchant’s communications working, the system they link into having power and communications, etc. With cash, it’s just “here, take this” and it’s all good.

  • 404found@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t see the benefit for the average person to get rid of cash. If it’s digital it’s trackable, can be hacked and more easily controlled by other parties. Also it allows for banks to charge more service fees.

  • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m happy with the opinions and reasons for it here.
    Unfortunately IRL people and especially the youth who have grown up with it are totally pro-digital.
    They look at you as if you’re a flat earther when you mention the possible consequences.