• favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Jesus said it best

      It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Bill Ackman, a billionaire hedge fund manager who has backed President Donald Trump in the past, on Thursday pledged to use his money to bankroll a challenger to Mamdani in the general election.

    Case in point.

    • MyRobotShitsBolts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      And how did he get those billions? How many peoples necks did he have to step on to climb his way up. It’s not so much what you do with your billions, it’s how you got them that makes you evil. The only exception to this is probably Bezos ex wife, maybe.

  • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Imagine life was a game. You lived for 2025 years. You worked 260 days / year. You made the median US salary.

    You would need to relive that process 3,145 times to match an Oligarch.

    That amount of wealth is unethical while humanity suffers. No one can really fathom “1b dollars.”

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Even the billionaires would be better off without billinaires. It their relative ranking was the same they would still have more money than they could spend but it would now come with clean air, water, land, better infrastructure, a healthier world, happier people to interact with.

    • OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      But could this really be done? As far as I’ve understood, billionaires typically don’t have a billion liquidized and ready for spending. Rather, their value is distributed in ownership of several companies. How would the 100% taxes on ownership in companies be applied?

      Don’t get me wrong, I would love to see it work, but I feel like it’s a lot more complicated than stated. And if a good way of applying those taxes would be introduced, I’m sure the billionaires would either find new ways to make the money untouchable or personally move to a country with looser tax laws.

      • ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s what conservatives always claim. Most of them won’t move and even if they do, good riddance. Simply tax their wealth beforehand.

  • Fives@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The super-wealthy are a cancer on society, and just like cancer, they suck up all of the resources while killing the patient.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    He is right.

    Imagine a “billionaire” in the wild: An animal sitting on a vast horde of food that it could never eat while others starved around it … yea, it would not last long.

    Imagine a “billionaire” in a living body. A corporate money making entity would basically be a cancer that had to be removed to save the life of the patient.

  • hellure@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I heard a rumor once that something called ‘greed’ was considered a sin.

    There might be others that are relevant too.

    These ‘sins’ and their opposing ‘virtures’ where considered such because of how they effected the communities influenced by them.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    No wealth above a certain amount should be inherited. There is no moral justification for absurd amounts of intergenerational wealth.