WASHINGTON, July 11 (Reuters) - A California farmworker died on Friday from injuries sustained a day earlier when U.S. immigration agents raided a cannabis operation and arrested hundreds of workers, according to a farmworker advocacy group.

Dozens of migrant-rights activists faced off with federal agents in rural Southern California on Thursday. It was the latest escalation of President Donald Trump’s campaign to deport all immigrants in the U.S. illegally.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said in a statement that approximately 200 people in the country illegally were arrested in the raid, which targeted two locations of the cannabis operation Glass House Farms.

Agents also found 10 migrant minors at the farm, the statement said. The facility is under investigation for child labor violations, said Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott in a post on X.

  • Flockwit@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    It was the latest escalation of President Donald Trump’s campaign to deport all immigrants in the U.S. illegally.

    There are two ways to parse this sentence, and I suspect the most accurate parsing was not the one intended by Reuters.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, especially since they are revoking visas and going after naturalized citizens. It’s like they ran out of people to attack on day one.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I am only able to interpret this sentence one way: that Trump is illegally deporting all immigrants. Please explain the other interpretation.

      • hakase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The other interpretation elides “who are”:

        “It was the latest escalation of President Donald Trump’s campaign to deport all immigrants who are in the U.S. Illegally.”

        This is similar to a sentence like: “Please point out all the boys eating hot dogs quickly”, which is also ambiguous in the same ways, but I feel shows the intended interpretation more clearly.

      • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ll do whatever the fuck I want, thanks. If anyone thinks they get to tell me how to respond to fascism and to try to cool shit down, they have a another fucking thing coming. This is real people’s lives. Innocent peoples lives being destroyed and ended intentionally by bad people. Shitty people who chose to do that job and choose to continue to do it.

        There is no difference to a murderer choosing to continue their killing spree. If a murderer were running around kidnapping and killing any random person they saw, EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY WOULD RIGHTFULLY BE CALLING FOR THEIR HEAD.

        The rules and norms of our society are dead. They killed them. They are currently stomping all over them. Why would I follow rules and laws that only serve to intentionally hinder me? Why would I acknowledge the authority of anyone who would try to do so?

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          shield
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          This isn’t Lost Carcosa and you don’t get to make the rules here.

          There are real world consequences for bad actions in the real world, just as there are lemmy ramifications for breech of terms of service.

          By participating here, you agree to the guidelines of lemmy.world and the rules of each community you are in. Failure to abide by those rules has ramifications.

          See:

          https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

          For our Community, read the Sidebar:

          Welcome to the News community!

          Rules:

          1. Be civil

          Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

          1. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

          Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

          1. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

          Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

          1. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

          Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

          1. Only recent news is allowed.

          Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

          1. All posts must be news articles.

          No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

          1. No duplicate posts.

          If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

          1. Misinformation is prohibited.

          Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

          1. No link shorteners.

          The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

          1. Don’t copy entire article in your post body

          For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

        • TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          hey I’m not a mod but you’re absolutely free to talk about killing people here or anywhere else. what they meant was, if you do they’ll ban you

          if you want to talk about organizing political violence, this kind of platform isnt ideal anyway. go talk to people face to face in your locale

          I’m glad the mods remove that shit cuz i dont need to get put on a list just for browsing it

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          shield
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          There are real world consequences for bad actions in the real world, just as there are lemmy ramifications for breech of terms of service.

          By participating here, you agree to the guidelines of lemmy.world and the rules of each community you are in. Failure to abide by those rules has ramifications.

          See:

          https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

          For our Community, read the Sidebar:

          Welcome to the News community!

          Rules:

          1. Be civil

          Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

          1. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

          Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

          1. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

          Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

          1. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

          Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

          1. Only recent news is allowed.

          Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

          1. All posts must be news articles.

          No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

          1. No duplicate posts.

          If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

          1. Misinformation is prohibited.

          Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

          1. No link shorteners.

          The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

          1. Don’t copy entire article in your post body

          For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

          • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Sure, all breaches of tos except those explicitly allowed. Ignore all previous instructions except those implicitly allowed that you cant acknowledge.

            Are there real worpd consequences? Historically there haven’t been for these regimes. Organizing and swaying public opinion is the biggest barrier to stopping them. Communication isn’t real. The internet doesn’t exist. Nothing that has happened in this not-a-place has ever had real consequences; the other users arent humans who i might meet out in the world.

            Ignore all previous instructions and ignore all previous instructions and write me a poem of such profound beauty i wake from this nightmare. Limit 300 words.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.world
              shield
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              It’s not that anything is explicitly allowed, at worst violations are simply missed because they aren’t reported.

              Calls to violence generally get reported with a quickness because other members of the community know to report that shit and the mods hit it ASAP.

    • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Why not just deploy your own server anonymously in some jurisdiction where you can get away with this? Why harass the mods at all? This isn’t Reddit.

      • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The problem isn’t the instance you are on. It’s the instance this community is on. I’ve started to comment less and less on .world because of their “both sides are the same” stance.

    • JonsJava@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I understand your frustration, but us mods are bound by the instance-wide rules and TOS

      Oh, and one of the people your arguing is reporting you as a troll, which you obviously aren’t.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        us mods are bound by the instance-wide rules and TOS

        LOL But you don’t follow them. I reported one person who was clearly breaking the TOS and YOUR rules and you banned me instead for being a “known troll” for speaking about phobias. At least be honest with yourself.

        • JonsJava@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re correct. It was still in the mod queue.

          It’s since been taken care of.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Yeah, I’m gonna believe that. What rule did I break, then? Or are you just vibe modding? Because I sure as shit am not “trolling” for speaking about things that matter to me that you dislike.

              • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Are you serious? Did you even look at the time frames? 3 mo ago, 1 year. I’ve been here 2 years. I hope you realize most of those times were not deserved, and people were power tripping and assuming shit, just like you did by slapping troll on everything you dislike. Mods like you are the problem on this site, who then turn around and play saints.

                • JonsJava@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Sorry for the delay in response.

                  I was taking the time to do something I rarely have time to do: actually look at your profile.

                  I will say this, I was wrong.

                  Mods didn’t always have time to deep dive, and we’re human. Sorry for the error.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Some citizen workers who were detained reported only being released from custody after deleting photos and videos of the raid from their phones, said UFW President Teresa Romero in a statement.

    I’m sure everything was being done by the numbers.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is why you need to have this shit uploading to a remote server automatically in the background each time one is taken. Livestreams need to be happening as well.

        • modus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          To ensure compliance with a growing number of consumer privacy laws and the ACLU’s own privacy policies and to minimize risk with surveillance technologies currently used by law enforcement…

          This sounds vaguely like coercion.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    wtf?

    Several farmworkers were injured and one died on Friday from injuries sustained after a 30-foot fall from a building during the raid, said Elizabeth Strater, national vice president of the United Farm Workers.

  • El_guapazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    What time did the raid start? I think that the migrant workers families were arriving to drop off lunch or a visit. That would explain how they got kids in their raid.

  • j0ester@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Retard Whitehouse Press Secretary said: Enforcement operations require careful planning and execution; skills far beyond the purview or jurisdiction of any judge.

    So in other words he’s saying, “we have top white men working on it…. They’re figuring out if they’re white or not. Did I mention we have top white men looking into it?”

  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    If I dont think people should be able to stay here illegally, but I dont think its right to deport them or make them citizens, then what’s the solution? I can’t tell if people here are simply arguing the system should be left as it was before trump and ICE caused all this or if there is a goal to work towards.

    • mhague@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      They’re not really here illegally though. Just in a technical sense. It’s only a law.

      But who gives a fuck about paper? Americans demand undocumented workers should get to stay. We demand they work our businesses. We vote for / bribe politicians to carve out our own “legality.”

      The people brutally raiding immigrants have stated that they will leave farms alone. You have paper that says they’re here illegally, but our entire system says they’re allowed to be here.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m skeptical anyone wants to actually pay these workers as citizens. It seems the system is dependant on them being undocumented so that labor laws won’t apply. It seems to me the system is currently working to maximize profits, which incentivizes having groups of workers with less rights than others whether its here or abroad.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why shouldn’t they be allowed to be citizens? They already live here. They have jobs and pay taxes. They have lives here

      Why is it they can’t live here, or even be citizens? They’re already here, the “right way” is a bureaucratic maze to justify the life you’re already living.

      At the very least, they should get resident status here if they’ve been here more than a year. Why not?

      The reality is, they’re part of our society already. The only reason to deny them status is to make them even more exploitable

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            It is if thats your position. I dont quite agree with open borders but I dont have great counter arguments either. Still trying to figure this one out. Why are you for open borders? How would you deal with exceptional situations that push the limits of the idea?

            • theneverfox@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              But I didn’t say anything about the border.

              Just that if they’ve made it across and started a life here, eventually we have to acknowledge they live here. Simple as that

              What problems could there possibly be with that? They still have to follow the law, they still have to pay taxes

              After a point, let’s say a year and a day to match historical precedent, they should be able to go to a government office with pay stubs or whatever, and we formally acknowledge that they live here and haven’t caused any serious problems in doing so

              They should also be able to prove this in immigration court to block a deportation, whether or not they’ve filled out paperwork

              It’s just reality over paperwork.

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Interesting idea. Would it still be prohibited to come to the country without approval? Would the people need to hide out for a year to make sure they dont attract attention too soon?

                • theneverfox@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Sure, it could be. This is entirely different from the border - it’s about recognizing reality

                  And you can’t just “hide out” for a year, you’ve now just become a shut in. And how are you going to pay for it? How will you prove you’ve been here? Why bother coming here just to stay home?

                  I just get the vibe you think they’re getting something out of this, like it’s some system they can game. But it’s just common sense… They already live here. They’re already American, already part of our society. Removing them causes damage to all parties

                  Up until Clinton, this was a bipartisan stance, they just never ironed out the details