Mohamed

Is is legal to commit war crimes in the United States? Because if it is, this becomes an ethical argument rather than a legal one.

I didnt find anything, which is kindof surprising. I did come across that Polymarket removed a bet on the fate of the stranded pilots.

Oh, 16 degrees Fahrenheit. Still, thats quite a bit.

The article listed 800% fps gains due to ntsync. Wait, were those over fsync, or vanilla?

That, isnt even logical enough to not make sense.

Gravest crime against humanity is not the same as the most suffering caused. It is not just number of people that suffered either.

In addition, while hatred for Iran is high in the Arab gulf, there is very intense hatred for Israel, amongst Sunnis as well. Given that Israel started this war and after what they did and continue to do to Gaza, I dont expect joining the war on the side of Israel would be very palateable to the public in the Arab gulf.

Yes. The war is definitely not going to embolden pro-government sentiment in Iran in a rally behind the flag effect. /s

Its not like its easy for the people to stop. Person À and Person B are both involved in a scuffle. Cop or whatever tells them to stop. If A stops but B doesn’t stop, A just gets his ass kicked as a best case, or might get killed as a worst case if B has a weapon, for example. And vice versa. They have to both stop at the same time, which means expecting coordination between them which is ridiculous.

There’s also the very real possibility that the homeowner did stop and freeze, but person B kept attacking, and so the cop still shot at them since they didn’t both stop.

It’s ridiculous that this needs explaining to a supposedly trained cop.

It baffles me that it is even possible to summarily strip citizenship like that.

Like, it would be a lot more reasonable if people born on US soil, only in the future, no longer get citizenship.

But how can it be legal to remove citizenship by redefining the law, and then retroactively stripping people of it that no longer fit the definition? Like, isn’t this the same as making a law in 2026 banning smoking, and then going back and jailing anyone who has ever smoked?

Pretty romantic

Yeah probably, but I think consumer hacks slash microchip companies might buy them and retrofit them to be GPU’s. If most of them are not just sold to the public, I suspect that nVIDIA et al might buy them back from business customers, and then modify them to re-sell to consumers.

Basically: you are getting those F-35’s whether you want them or not.

The title first read to me: Leaders alarmed at how fair the investigation is (I.e. they want it to be unfair)

Isn’t there a legally important conflict of interest here? The investigation is against an officer of ICE, given immunity by the Executive Branch. An investigation is only trustworthy, at least a bit, if handled by an outside investigator.

“… and new to the city.” Aha! She was an immigrant!

Tweaking in what sense? Like just default search engines and such, or is it about:config settings?

I’m just curious.

Wait till RFK hears that “mainstream” medicine is exploring psychedelic treatments as well - then he has ro disavow them to stay a contrarian.

I think that revoking a citizen’s citizenship should only be decidable by the supreme court, and there needs to be a new trial for every single time the DOJ tries to revoke the citizenship of a citizen.

I think that because that means every triaé must be taken very seriously, and there cannot be summary revocations.

Oh. Actually that clarifies alot.