DickFiasco@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoStinglemm.eeimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1267arrow-down110
arrow-up1257arrow-down1imageStinglemm.eeDickFiasco@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squareDickFiasco@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 years agoMatt Keeslar. He played Feyd in the 2000 miniseries.
minus-squareboogetyboo@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoI’ve never seen it. Was it any good?
minus-square_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoIt was very much a product of its time. It was alright.
minus-squareFeydaikin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoIt’s good if you want something more ‘close to the books’ story wise. However, the Harkonnens are quite dialed back (they always are). And everything is low budget. But personally, I enjoyed it and still re-watch it from time to time.
minus-squareDickFiasco@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoIt’s enjoyable if you watch it in the context of it’s time. You can’t compare it to the Villeneuve version.
Who is the first one?
Matt Keeslar. He played Feyd in the 2000 miniseries.
I’ve never seen it. Was it any good?
It was very much a product of its time. It was alright.
It’s good if you want something more ‘close to the books’ story wise.
However, the Harkonnens are quite dialed back (they always are). And everything is low budget.
But personally, I enjoyed it and still re-watch it from time to time.
It’s enjoyable if you watch it in the context of it’s time. You can’t compare it to the Villeneuve version.