• scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Japan. Layoffs are extremely difficult to pull off there. You have to show poor performance by the individual involved, and the standards for that are very rigorous. The government knows that unemployed people immediately become their problem, so they just demand that if a corporation wants to employ someone, they have to be willing to enter into that in an open ended arrangement. So unions aren’t the only way.

    • Melllvar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’m curious how it’s considered a “layoff” if it’s based on performance rather than the job itself being eliminated.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It’s not.

        What I meant was you can dismiss people for poor performance, but that’s the only valid reason. You cannot lay people off in Japan in the sense of “we cut the budget and decided we don’t want to employ you anymore.”

        However, that said… if you want to lay someone off, you can jump through a million hoops. I have seen people relegated to ridiculously inappropriate roles to convince them to leave. You can also mess with non-salary compensation if you want. And you can offer generous severance. And maybe you can convince people to let you “lay them off.”

      • stringere@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Wrong. The unemployed are just temporarily displaced slaves waiting to become homeless so they can be put in prison for poorcrime.