ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 5 months agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up1518arrow-down110file-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up1508arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square131fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-squareKintarian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·5 months agoI’d like to go to one of their houses and tell them I want to search the place. After all, they shouldn’t mind if they have nothing to hide, right?
minus-squareDigit@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-25 months agoProbably a bluff. I’m sure they’d not want you to find their dungeon, or evidence of their corruption and bribery. [Edit: nor just all the usual parts of privacy and data integrity.]
I’d like to go to one of their houses and tell them I want to search the place. After all, they shouldn’t mind if they have nothing to hide, right?
Probably a bluff.
I’m sure they’d not want you to find their dungeon, or evidence of their corruption and bribery.
[Edit: nor just all the usual parts of privacy and data integrity.]