The Evangineer Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months ago

Trump's drops IVF promise, preferring to blame women for infertility

www.salon.com

external-link
message-square
69
fedilink
499
external-link

Trump's drops IVF promise, preferring to blame women for infertility

www.salon.com

Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months ago
message-square
69
fedilink
Instead of treatment, Project 2025 proposes shaming patients for premarital sex
  • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    While true, its the other women I worry for

    • npdean@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      This will trigger a lot of people but since Trump has been elected, it is safe to assume that more than 50% women support him, so…

      • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Mmmm im pretty sure he only got like 1/3 of women, it was men who carried him

        Edit: closer to half but women still went majority for Harris

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Pretty sure he won with white women

          • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              So… The first picture isn’t really relevant since it doesn’t appear to factor in race.

              The second one is nearly meaningless to me as a static photo. What the hell am I even looking at? Clearly this is something meant to be interacted with.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          gonna need to see some stats. republiQan women had their chance and it’s gone now.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Lol - gonna need to see stats (downvotes a-poppin’)

            Edit: okay not 2/3 more like half (downvotes continue)

            😆

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Why would you post something that’s so easily disproven?

        • npdean@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Thanks for the info, I didn’t know

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, that is not a safe assumption.

      • shishka_b0b@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        no.

        • npdean@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          It is quite a logical assumption, excluding gerrymandering

          • leadore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Not logical at all.

            • npdean@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Why?

              • leadore@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                If a candidate wins a majority of the population as a whole, it is not logical to assume they won a majority of all demographics in that population.

                More specifically, in the previous 2 times he ran before the 2024 election, we knew that the majority of women voters voted against him. And that he won one of those elections in spite of not getting a majority of women. So the logical thing to assume would be that he didn’t get the majority of women in 2024 either, in spite of the fact that he won that election. Which is what happened.

                • npdean@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Makes sense

      • erin@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well, almost half of women that voted supported him! Guess we’ll just have to abandon the whole lot. Problem solved.

News@lemmy.world

news@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@lemmy.world

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.65K users / day
  • 5.63K users / week
  • 10.8K users / month
  • 23.6K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 37.4K subscribers
  • 24.9K Posts
  • 519K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • jeffw@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • rjc@lemmy.world
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.4-rc.5
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org