I made the unfortunate post about asking why people liked Arch so much (RIP my inbox I’m learning a lot from the comments) But, what is the best distro for each reason?

RIP my inbox again. I appreciate this knowledge a lot. Thank you everyone for responding. You all make this such a great community.

  • Günther Unlustig 🍄@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Fedora Atomic because I don’t fucking care what package manager and whatnot sits underneath.

    I just wanna relax in my free time and not worry about all this fucking nerd stuff.

    Touching grass > Troubleshooting a broken system

  • sakphul@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    For me it’s openSUSE Tumbleweed on my Desktops/Laptops and openSuse Leap on my Servers. The killing Feature for me was the propper BTRFS integration with Snapper for seamless rollbacks in case I borked the system in some way.

    One “downside” for me is the mix of Gnome Settings and Yast on my Desktop. But I like yast on my servers for managing everything (enabling ports in firewall, network config, enable autoamtic isntall of security updates, etc.). Also openSuse is not that common, so sometimes it is hard to find a solution if you have a distribution specific question.

    Personally never looked to closely into openSuse Build Services (OBS). But I know some people who really like it.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    OpenSUSE Tumbleweed/Slowroll

    Tumbleweed is the only bleeding-edge rolling release distribution that just works and never fails and is super easy to install and manage without any expertise. And it is massively underrated and forgotten for no good reason.

    All Tumbleweed packages go through extensive and to this day unrivaled automatic system testing that ensures no package is ever gonna bork itself or your system.

    If you’re still worried about stability, there is Slowroll - currently testing, but in my experience very stable distribution. It makes rolling release updates…a bit slower, so that they’re only pushed after Tumbleweed users absolutely ensure everything is great and stable (not that it’s ever otherwise). It does the same job as Manjaro, but this time around it actually works without a hitch.

    Both deliver great experience and will suit novice users.

  • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    OpenSUSE tumbleweed: Up-to-date, unbreakable due to Btrfs+snapper, very secure defaults (firewall), based in Germany. It works perfectly on my Thinkpad, so I couldn’t ask for better.

  • Atreides@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Void. Minimal, all the programs I need are in the repos, which is a first for me. Very fast.

  • jjba23@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    With Guix you have reproducibility, freedom, good docs and peace of mind, also when configuring things more deeply. You also have a powerful programming language (Scheme / Lisp) with which to define your system config as well as your dotfiles. This is my insight after years of GNU/Linux usage. I run Guix on laptops, desktops and servers, and I never have configuration drift, as well as the benefit that I have a self documenting system.

    https://codeberg.org/jjba23/sss

  • mat@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I (maybe) ended distrohopping last year when I gave NixOS a shot. I can’t recommend it for beginners but once you understand generally how things work on Linux (and have an interest in programming) it’s a superpower to be able to define your entire setup as a single git repository. If something ever breaks, I can reboot into an older commit and keep using my computer, or branch off in a different direction… I’ve only scratched the surface of NixOS and yet I can already make a live USB containing my setup with a single command, or deploy it (“infect”) to another machine and manage e.g my work desktop and my personal laptop sharing most settings. Also it taught me about Nix (the package manager, which also runs on any distro and macOS independent of NixOS) which I now use to set up perfect development environments for each of my projects… if I set up dependencies once (as a flake.nix shell), it’ll work forever and anywhere.

    • a14o@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Same for me. I distro-hopped for about 20 years with OpenSuse, Ubuntu, Debian, Arch and Fedora being the most memorable desktop setups for me. While all that was a valuable experience, NixOS feels like graduation.

      For the Nix-curious: I wish someone would have told me not to bother with the classic config and build a flake-based system immediately. They’re “experimental” in name only, very stable and super useful in practice.

  • ragas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Gentoo because it is as stable as Debian, less bloated than Arch, has more packages than Ubuntu, is rolling release, can mix and match stable, testing and unstable on a whim.

    Even its one downside, compile times, is now gone if you just choose to use binary packages.

    • kaidezee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      And less stable than Arch, and more bloated than Ubuntu… If that is something you want for whatever reason! It is the most versatile distro in existance because it’s literally anything you want it to be - clean and nice, or total chaos. What is there not to love?

      Gentoo <3

  • Fecundpossum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    EndeavourOS Bcause:

    It’s Arch with an easy installer, with all of the most common administration tools already installed

    With the Arch repo, AUR, and flatpak I have a wide breadth of software to choose from

    I can easily install it without a desktop environment to install and set up Hyprland without the clutter of another DE

    Not to mention it’s active and friendly community and excellent documentation

      • Fecundpossum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sorry, I misread your comment on my first reply. Yes, you can have gnome and hyprland installed side by side, you would just use SDDM to choose what session you’re starting at login.

  • WILSOOON@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Arch is the best, the arch wiki is massive, pacman is just amazing, no nvidia drivers bullshitting, and rolling release has only broken one thing once, life under the arch is pretty great

    • hallettj@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Arch wiki is the best! I reference often, even though I’m generally applying the information to other distros

    • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Also PKGBUILD’s are the superior packaging format. Back in the day people use to talk about preferring debian or redhat based distros based on how much they liked debs or rpms. Building packages on Arch is easier than pretty much any distro I have ever tried to build packages on.

      • UnityDevice@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I recently needed to build newer versions of some packages for Debian. Now, they’re go based so the official packaging is super complicated and eventually I decided to try and make my own from scratch. After a few more hours of messing with the official tooling I start thinking “there must be a better way.”

        And sure enough, after a bit of searching I found makedeb which allows you to make debs from (almost) regular PKGFILEs. Made the task a million times simpler.

  • squid64@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I use GNU Guix System and I really like how it works. Is it the best? There is no best really but to me those distros with 100% free software are the best. Like Trisquel, Parabola and GNU Guix System

  • malwieder@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Tumbleweed. Rolling release with automated testing (openQA), snapper properly setup out of the box.

    Honestly the entire openSUSE ecosystem. Tumbleweed on my main PC that often has some of the latest hardware, Slowroll on my (Framework) laptop because it’s rolling but slower (monthly feature updates, only fixes in-between), and Leap for servers where stability (as in version/compatibility stability, not “it doesn’t crash” stability) is appreciated.

    openSUSE also comes in atomic flavors for those interested. And it’s European should you care.

    With all that being said, I don’t really care much about what distro I’m using. What I do with it could be replicated with pretty much any distro. For me it’s mostly just a means to an end.

  • monovergent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Debian. Truly the universal operating system. Runs on all of my laptops, desktops, servers, and NAS with no fuss and no need to keep track of distro-specific differences. If something has a Linux version, it probably works on Debian.

    Granted, I am a bit biased. All of my hardware is at least 5 years old. Also came from Windows, where I kept only the OS and browser up to date, couldn’t be bothered with shiny new features. A package manager is already a huge luxury.

    • limelight79@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I know. Stop worrying about your computer and install Debian! It just works. It updates without a problem.