Just guessing, but she probably felt hurt and rejected. Doesn’t matter how kindly you phrase it, her hopes and wants were built on fragile insecurity in the temperament of turbulent emotions. The slightest breeze of sincerity, no matter how warm, was all it took to break down her shelter of dreams. It left her naked and exposed to the elements of loneliness, within the closed borders of her skull - what chance did your kindness have when the envoys find themselves crashing upon walls, and her ears herald that they must be under attack?

I mean maybe you just said something really wacky but elsewise nah you’re fine

Couldn’t you just set up actual AI/LLM verification questions, like “how many r’s in strawberry?”

Or even just have an AI / Manual contribution divide. Wouldn’t stop everything 100% but might help the clean-up process better

To be the equivalent of someone making $10k giving $100 to charity, a millionaire would have to give $10k.

A billionaire would have to give 10 million dollars.

“Please calculate the totals to reflect a favourable result”

Sorry, for security issues, we can’t let you know what you’re doing

I’ve been pronouncing it all-e-glucky

Manipulativeness

“Hey, I was wondering if you could help me figure something out. I was really flattered by your invite the other day, but I’m not interested in dating right now. I enjoy your friendship and I don’t want to jeopardize it. Is there a way we can comfortably set boundaries without ruining that?”

IMO this way you let them know you’re interested in maintaining a relationship but at a friendship level. You demonstrate that you care about their feelings while clearly establishing the need for specific boundaries.

fuck yeah, spread it

wait, we’re bringing Riley memes back?

I mean, yeah

create rule: from microsoft teams -> trash

Alexisonfire had the same problem. Their website was theonlybandever.com because alexisonfire.com was for the adult actress Alexis, and her pornographic content.

what the fuck is a bird

nervously realizing I’ve been using Discord in Türkiye for 4 days straight now

Microsoft again?

When I challenge my established concepts with new ideas or angles, and realize my previously held truth doesn’t hold up to scrutiny, or is reinforced or expanded upon. For example, “is a hot dog a sandwich?” makes me reconsider how so much depends on context, and how we as humans crave labelling and categorizing to the point of it being detrimental (see biological sex vs gender, Star Trek edit wars, classical music and pornography cataloguing, etc)

No, there’s nothing down there, just a shirtless incel that browses Vchan all day. Scared of flashlights for some reason

Fool me once

He’s probably locked up in a vampire basement somewhere

The science is pretty clear; gun control works. Every time you repeal gun control laws, loosen restrictions, open gun stores, gun-related deaths escalate, often dramatically. States with higher gun ownership rates have higher rates of homicides caused by guns. Even a 1% reduction in gun related deaths would be the equivalent of 2,500 people per year. Kids die more often from gun-related deaths than car-related deaths.

Mass shootings also barely make up 1% of gun-related deaths, so the science behind them isn’t as well studied, but things like reducing magazine sizes shows a correlated relation in reduction of mass shootings.

(Some of the sauce)