down

Windows Recall

Arch.

Because of pacman. Building and writing packages is simple and dependencies are slim. Also packages are recent. And most likely “there is an AUR package for that”. Also stack transitions arrive early, like pipewire.

Also let’s not forget Arch Wiki, i bet you have read it as a non Arch user.

I administer Arch on 8 machines including gaming rigs, home server, web server, kids laptop, wifes gaming desktop, audio workstation and machine learning rig and a bunch of dev laptops. I also use ArchARM on RPi for some home automation.

Never considered switching since I switched from Ubuntu over 15 years ago.

I do have experience with several other rpm and apt based distros.

Gelsinger said the market will have less demand for dedicated graphics cards in the future.

In other news, Intel is replaced by Nvidia in the Dow Jones, a company that exclusively produces dedicated graphics cards: https://lemmy.world/post/21576540

What if I told you this option doesn’t actually get respected?

that executes a script on your Windows.

I don’t have a Windows.

The issue here is that the cheese gets consumed for the sandwitch. Knowledge does not lost when it gets passed. Cheese does.

It’s MIT and actually a fork of Mono. Reading the article helps.

https://github.com/dotnet/core

https://github.com/dotnet/runtime

With open version you don’t mean open source right? Because it’s open source. MIT is also not a restricitve license. https://github.com/dotnet/core

Lets wait for any LLM do a single sucessful MR on Github first before starting a project on its own. Not aware of any.

You still use X11?

There is an active fork https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenMandriva_Lx

Technology wise, Usenet abuses decade old Mailbox protocols and software for file downloads it was never designed for. Torrents are modern, decentralized and redundant. Usenet was always a huge PITA. Especially if some parts were missing.