I’m posting mostly before sleep, while hitting that bubba kush pen and without glasses so bare with me if I have typos or if I’m not making sense. Always happy to hear the thoughts of others

  • 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 3rd, 2024

help-circle











  • I’ve seen and heard some fucked up shit in my life but damn tech and ai just keep giving some novel sadistic shit each fucking day.

    Its slavery.

    Fifty-two percent of surveyed workers believe they are training AI to replace other workers’ jobs, and 36% believe they are training AI to replace their own jobs. 74% were concerned about AI’s contribution to the spread of disinformation, 54% concerned about surveillance, and 47% concerned about the use of AI to suppress free speech, among other issues.

    Medidwhy do we allow this to happen just that some sadistic fucks would get richer?




  • I very much agree with your conclusions and general approach.

    LLMs are great for certain tasks that are programming related and it does it very well. I, too, often find myself needing scripts that as long as they did what they were suppose to, I really didn’t care how.

    Another thing I’ve noticed(which is probably related to amounts of training data) is that it can help better with simple Python tasks as opposed to how it handles simple rust tasks.

    But you mentioned one of my main issues with. Ice been programming for 15 years or so, and still learning. All the available llms did crucial errors about fundamental tabd complex topics and got the answer so very wrong but also sounding very convincing. Couple it with lack of proper linking to the sources of the response, you might see why having it explain code might cause your learn wrongly. Although it is also possible to say this about randoms internet tutorials. I always try to remind myself that it’s a tool that produces output that always needs to be verified.