https://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/

An overview of the testing they’ve done, some of the vulnerabilities they’ve found, and hashes of others in the disclosure pipeline.

You deserve comparison to someone who dismissed a huge technological advancement as a fad.

Sorry, it’s what you deserve. You just really, really want to hate AI, and when people try to tell you that it has good points, you don’t want to hear it. Time will tell, I suppose.

Russian fascist, fuck off

https://mastodon.social/@nixCraft/111695037458159431

As another technologist, I have to remind everyone that unless you subscribe to some rather fringe theories, humans are also based on standard physics.

Which is math. All the way down.

That’s his point, yes. You mention gun control LLMs in a positive light on Reddit lemmy, you get absolutely dogpiled by rabid ammosexuals ai haters.

c/confidentlyincorrect

Thanks, OP, interesting read. Please don’t let the luddites get you down.

Read the article. You might learn something.

I would hope that if you give a human a text and ask them to cite facts from it they would do better than 99% correct.

That’s literally what school exams are about, isn’t it?

Token window is a problem for all llms though, that’s not easily solved, but it can be worked around to a certain extent.

GLM 4.5 is from August. Isn’t the real tl;dr that a seven month old open model, which was behind proprietary models at the time, did better than most humans would?

no u

Good grief, the irrational ai kneejerk hate in this community is insane. This seems like a perfect use case - a code base with good test coverage and well defined output expectations, where a human has guided the translation and checked the results. The human in question has saved a lot of time. And still all the comments are “hurr durr slop amirite”. SMH fucking head.

«AI bad. Give karma»

Opus 4.6 actually doing that analysis in a one-shot is fairly impressive. I imagine there would have to have been a setup in place for access to Bluetooth at the very least?

…I don’t understand your comment, I think. Is pointing out historical facts ad hominem? My (small) point was that I’m not certain that the sudden prosperity that some workers in the US enjoyed was entirely sustainable. That said, the development since the seventies or so has definitely gone hard in the other direction. I’m not competent to comment on the causes, but successful deunionization, destruction of the educational system, and overseas outsourcing of everything productive are probably in there somewhere.

Mostly for white people, and mostly because the US had built out an enormous industrial base to win WWII, and also was in the unique position of not having been destroyed by the war.

*torment

goatse. that is all.