https://archive.is/KYfIk

Altman should have stayed fired, the only reason petite wanted him back was he’s a great salesman liar and promised millions to all the staff.

FTFY

My dentist called me to book an appointment and less than 5 seconds later, my wife called. She’s obviously cheating on me with the dentist.

Unless they become part of the military industrial complex

That won’t happen due to token limits. According to Anthropic, only about 5% of users hit the limit.

Let’s do some estimates:

• An 8x H100 machine costs about $20 / hr to rent.
• With a 70B model with 4K context, a H100 node can do about 300 requests in parallel.
• A single response takes around 30 seconds to generate.
• An average user sends about 300 messages / month.

The throughput of a node is

300 concurrent * (3600 / 30) = 36 000 messages / hour.

The cost per message, then, is $20 / 36 000 = $.00055…

With 300 messages per month, the compute cost for the AI vendor is 300*$20/36000 = $0.16 / month per user. By contrast, a subscription costs $20.

So given these assumptions, it’s other things (like R&D, safety research, training runs, free accounts, etc) that represent the bulk of the cost and those could be scaled down to turn a profit. What will they do? Give how hyped AI is currently and the competitive landscape, I don’t think they’ll increase prices that much. We have products like DeepSeek on the horizon which are much cheaper, so it’s more likely that they squeeze money out of it by becoming more efficient.

Maybe it should just say “this means your intelligence is below average”. I genuinely think someone with <80 IQ would have a very low chance of understanding the text as presented in the screenshot.

Stupid people are people with human rights too, and they should be considered with empathy when building a society. That should be particularly obvious to a site that performs IQ tests. For every person with an IQ above 100, there’s a person below.

Robots.txt is used to prevent search engines like google from fetching and adding specific pages on your web server to their search index.

What are you asking here? Who do you want to stop from doing what with your manuscript?

It is, but this here is just YouTube being retarded.

I suspect it was part of some stupid copy protection scheme

Because nothing has changed since then, except for the worse.

Buddha. I get to reach Nirvana right after this form.

Adobe has no scruples.

I used to work for a full-disk encryption vendor in the 2000s, and one customer had an issue where the machine would BSOD sometimes if both our product and Adobe Acrobat were installed. It seemed a mystery or just a red herring - what on Earth did Acrobat do that could trigger a kernel-mode crash?

Turned out that every hour or so, Acrobat would be reading and writing back the master boot record (containing the OS bootstrap code and partition table) on the primary hard drive. The bug was ours (to unlock the hard drive keys at boot we had to put different data there and redirect I/O after Windows started, and this redirection code would crash once in a blue moon), but Adobe has no business mucking about with this extremely sensitive data.

I read this from the start with the mind that it’s probably an April fool’s joke, but not once did I see any indication to exaggerate or build up to a humorous absurdness. It’s just a long article that could be true but isn’t. Stupid and a waste of time.

This would have been a good time to have it

Cause it is manually assembled. They have a blueprint if you want to do it yourself at a much lower price.

NIH

I wasn’t implying that, but a new instance of the same model also uses up resources to manufacture.

That would be fine if parts like the battery, charger port and microphone were replaceable. But they’re not, and so I need a new phone when there’s no capacity left in my existing one.

The article says “sometimes provide less-accurate and less-truthful responses to users who have lower English proficiency”. This is what I was commenting on. I don’t have enough understanding to comment on your case.