Internet addiction is a serious thing, don’t go flagrantly casting aspersions in ignorance. Enjoyment and passion for something doesn’t necessarily equate to addiction. Seriously touch grass my friend.

For my right to be treated as an equal, sure bud.

Whoops, left your projector on.

I’m angry at people belittling my sex for uncontrollable characteristics, ergo this makes me a right-winger a-hole? Alright then.

Wonder who’s really spreading misinformation, we all know who it is.

Bait.

Fuck off.

What “angry rhethoric” am I spreading?

That “hurtful comments are hurtful”?

Or perhaps you dislike true feminism and are more inclined to agree with extremists.

Is it really an assumption if it’s based on personal experience? You’re now saying that the reductive rhethoric is hurtful, but you started with how I was in the wrong. Funny how “reductive” you yourself were being.

The hypocrisy has clearly gone unnoticed.

Of course a drunk would say that.

The first step in dealing with an issue is accepting it exists. If you and your cohort keep dancing around the issue of feminism’s extreme and unwarranted toxicity around masculinity, you’ll never understand how vile it really is and fix it.

I’m sure the individuals you’re talking about are very well versed and definitely not extremists through their intellectual usage of “micropener” and “micropeem”. Surely they couldn’t possibly just be bigots.

Wonder how you’d react if the genders were reversed in those comments? You’d probably upvote and spew even more misandrist rhetoric, knowing your type.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/understanding-the-erotic-code/201608/misandry-the-invisible-hatred-of-men

Found another crazed feminist:

I mean, you do see the irony of saying that on a website filled with Linux-crazed people, right…?

I can’t remove the downvote, you’ll need to do that yourself.

It’s the same car regardless of location. If you can’t see the parking lines then extrapolate, idiot.

Get a smaller truck, jfc. What if the lines were children?

Agreed!

But there’s also a certain expectation of “flamboyance” from the gay community, or you’re “not gay enough” and I think a lot of self-identifying queer peeps are to blame.

On top of the poor history of the word, I just don’t want to be associated with colourfulness and energy because that’s simply not who I am. People from outside looking into LGBTQ+ assume that that’s who gay men need to be because of media representation… It makes me tired.

Queer. Not all gay men (the one group I can safely speak about) like to be associated with an ex-slur and its connotations.

Lmao at people downvoting good advice. I sure hope those mongoloids downvoting you don’t get an aneurysm from their stupidity or something (whoops, almost forgot they wouldn’t understand sarcasm without an /s!)