

Jesus wouldn’t accept it from the entire conversation we had, someone else even chiming in. Next time look it up yourself if you don’t believe anything instead of shoving refusal in everyone’s face until someone finally had enough. Why do I bother.


Jesus wouldn’t accept it from the entire conversation we had, someone else even chiming in. Next time look it up yourself if you don’t believe anything instead of shoving refusal in everyone’s face until someone finally had enough. Why do I bother.


ACKSUALLY you didn’t. The news writers saw it and told you, I saw it and told you, other people saw it and told you, everyone saw it and told you. You would not accept it. You jumped through every hoop you could and blamed everyone else to not accept it. Ciao.


Jesus the article and everyone is telling you what happened and you just won’t accept it.


The alert popped up on the phone with the link, which people could not see.
But instead of conveying vital information that could help locate the victim within the notification itself, the law enforcement agency linked to a post from its official X account


If you’re looking for media to fight for democracy, I think you’re looking in the wrong place. Media is supposed to present the news. Then people can act on it.


Musical number on it https://youtu.be/o7jlFZhprU4


This helps explain the low pay high workload mantra.


And they’re like, don’t vote so hard.


Like way to kill your platform for anything educational where you want to pause to look at a graph.


Can you just give us the TLDE?


Has anybody ever seen the movie “Gangs of New York?” That’s what I’m talking about. We know that when you have these massive ethnic enclaves forming in our country, it can sometimes lead to higher crime rates. … things like what we’ve done over the last few years, which is have 20-25 million illegal aliens just setting up shop here with no control, no enforcement, and no real ability to police what’s going on. That is a disaster.
Worth reading the whole quote, the article goes right to it.


The most serious blow came from the Supreme Court in the 2013 decision Shelby County v. Holder, which ruled that states with a long history of voting discrimination no longer needed to approve their election changes with the federal government. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his majority opinion that “things have changed dramatically” in the South, but since the ruling nearly 100 restrictive voting laws have been passed in at least 29 states, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. As a result of the Shelby decision and a slew of new anti-voting measures passed by Republicans in the wake of Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election, voters in almost half the country will face new voting restrictions at the polls in 2024.
Also talks about a map which sounds like gerrymandering.


From wiki
Red Ventures is an American media company that owns and operates brands such as Lonely Planet, CNET, ZDNet, The Points Guy, Healthline, and Bankrate.[1] Red Ventures focuses on news, advice, and review websites.[2]
Seems pretty straightforward.


No spine and succumbs to peer pressure. No surprise here.


In a now-deleted Reddit post, one victim described how a “neo-nazi gang” with “their shirts off with swastika and other nazi symbols” held their friends underwater. One victim suffered a concussion, facial swelling, and a bruised retina resulting in partial vision loss, while another received a bruised eye, according to interviews with the victims. At least two sought medical attention after the attack.
The Observer acquired footage of the attack recorded by an eyewitness and verified the Reddit post’s claims with the victims. Video appears to show individuals who were part of the group that included the ABT members or supporters instigating the fight, which lasted approximately two minutes and took place in a part of the San Marcos River that is only a few feet deep. In the footage, apparent perpetrators seem to submerge two of the victims underwater.
A video https://youtu.be/YeHppy0c1nM
Article has lots of pics showing tattoos and affiliations.


This is clearly only the ones that negatively affect them (the bar).


“Let me in! Let me back in!”
Jeez this guy if he thinks he can play.


So legally it should be fine to decide at the DNC?


How is it that states can decide (or whatever the correctt word is) who’s on the ballot when the party hasn’t even officially nominated a candidate? I know that political parties are separate from election institutions, but it seems very strange. And it seems very early for states to have it set in stone.
Tell him the best employees will quit. The rest will be too burnt out to actually do anything truly productive.