Why is the full understanding of that saying not used when completing it fully? You remove bad apples from the bunch so that the rot doesn’t spread. They all become bad if you don’t do that. Not saying that’s the case for cops in any of these digestions, one way or another. But just saying, sayings.

It’s ok, you don’t seem to have the capability that others did.

Most probably not. Although it does happen.

That anecdote has been around for a long time. But they all hired somebody. Probably somebody without 5 years exp.

I understand what you’re saying and I’m not certain either.

But, given that the context is a response to concern, it makes it sound like they’re suggesting that she’s gunning for the outcome. Like “don’t worry about them they’re all setup now.” A nobody who is now a champion of liberalism.

It just reads weird. Maybe they are just an ernest doomer who believes nobody is employable, but also thinks that everything will work out here. Stranger things have happened. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Right? The framing of that comment is very strange. Suspicious even.

That’s also weird, though. “Like the rest of us” means nothing, plenty are employable, a vast majority are actually.

So, to assume they “probably went from unemployable” to winning the job lottery with a nonprofit is certainly a take.

Weird to assume she is unemployable too, tbh.

What the actual fuck. That was not defending anything of the sort. You tried to compare full body and face tattoos to the numbers tattooed on Jewish prisoners at Auschwitz. And took criticism of that dumb statement as a defense of the actions taken by the trump admin. Which it was not.

Then you tried to defend that by lying and saying that there were people tatooed that way there, too.

And now you have the nerve to try and frame it as defending foreign imprisonment because you are a moron who got called out on thier bullshit. So, congrats.

The fed is not federal despite the name. And the current chair sits until 2026.

Just move it to stuff that guarantees 40% plus. 2ez. git gud. /s

It’s because some people don’t actually support workers, especially creative workers, regardless or their political identity.

abusive or threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice on the basis of ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or most importantly against people who have just the worst takes.

Hmmm, checks out. I guess the technology platform, YouTube, should get right on that too.

What law are you taking about?

I want to figure out how stupid this is, but there are no equations in all of the high level math and physics I perform regularly and flawlessly to calculate the amount of stupid in this.

You can still buy new ones. Take a nap.

Seems like that’s what it was infering, given the quote above it. Like, “There’s a reason they live in proximity” meaning “we shouldn’t interfere with that”

Except humans prevented it by removing predators. That’s a reason for them to return to living in proximity. There should be predators.

Satisfied keyboard warriors everywhere agree.

Or, actually, it’s sampling bias.