deleted by creator

Maybe the data brokers might delete based on the requests, but it seems this is a lot deeper than anything the GDPR could fix as the data would be reuploaded and updated, because the data comes from the “analytics” and “diagnostics” SDKs, being uploaded to data brokers and unified under the advertisement ID from google and apple devices/browsers.

I think this could only be broken by not using the advertisement ID (that was promised to help anonimize the advertisement data) and block all the requests by DNS blocking on the whole device, like with Ublock Origin + Hosts file + pihole/nextdns/adguard, etc.

Edit: also blocking cwsystem.com, cwtapp.com, cobwebsapp.com and subdomains, because they can host malware made from the company that owns this system.

Probably.

I think almost all calls these days are scams, like phishing, advertisements, voice cloning, the usual nigerian prince (he’s still alive).

Ultimately I noticed a lot of new scams running around and some gov.br websites serving a lot of scams (they existed before only as redirects to scams, now they seem to be hosted in there too). A friend of mine tried to delete a 2FA token from her phone and got calls about that from a completely different “agency”.

Seems like the script kiddie bar got higher…

Edit: But on this case, the article doesn’t give any source

Idk, i think it should have reparations, like, if for hundreds of years, robbing, killing, enforcing servitude of tens of millions of people for the enrichment of a few countries should make these countries pay. It gave these countries the backbone to todays “welfare states”, the industrial revolution was kickstarted on the cotton and sugar fields that these enslaved people worked, etc, etc, etc.

I don’t care about the legality, the wording, the whatever, it seems pretty clear to me that this should happen, and them giving this response shows that basically they don’t care and never cared.

This seems a very simplistic way of seeing racism. Like, to me, complex human interactions and systems cannot be simplified in this manner:

Some are expressed as formulas (priviledge+power or prejutice+power) with the key concept being power.

There’s a lot more nuance than this. If you’re thinking about structural racism, the legal, the opportunity given, segregational, educational and societal (even if not official) factors of racism, that’s what I think it is, the amalgamation of various factors into the added institution of racism, as they are at the structural foundation of our modern society, not just a guy being racist, not just priviledge, but the educational access for black people or laws implicitly made to keep latinos out of legality (some examples).

It’s not that simple. Check this and this as they’re a good start.

And, to the question, in the definition I just gave, the question:

To what extent is the standard structural definition of racism structurally racist?

Doesn’t even make sense, as describing the ways racism prevail in society is not racist, because the definition of racism is a lot different than this.

deleted by creator

If I remember correctly, payment data is required to be logged for 10 years.

Edit: This varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but it’s normally 5-10 years.

Estou respondendo assim porque eu não consegui puxar seu comentário aqui pelo Calckey/Sharkey (e também não recebi notificação, vi pelo Lemmy.ml sem conta por ali para responder diretamente). O Calckey deu erro alegando que sua instância retornou um formato de dados “incorreto” (“Response is invalid: It could communicate with this server, but the data obtained was incorrect”).

Pra mim está dando esses problemas tem um tempo, não sei o pq, parece problema com o contexto do json-ld do activitypub, uma hora vou ter que ver isso kkkk.

Ademais, há não muito tempo, houve toda uma migração para TPM 2.0, inclusive por parte da comunidade Linux. O TPM 2.0 talvez seja a forma pela qual todo esse lance de verificação de idade ocorrerá, a nível de hardware. É onde, inclusive, faria mais sentido tecnicamente falando: é um hardware que basicamente dita o que pode ou não na máquina

Ah sim, objetivo é não usar isso e rodar tudo local mesmo. Rodar tudo em no que era servidor chinês e foi dilacerado kkkkk (kit xeon da vida).

Eu falei de meme kkkkkk, mas vou procurar uma distro 100% livre, talvez ir de vez pro GNU Guix, e se der nunca mais interajo com nada proprietário ou de serviços online, hostear minhas coisas em casa mesmo, como esta instância da qual falo.

Vou precisar mostrar minha CNH pro meu próprio servidor? Acho que não, pelo menos não tem como saber, a não ser que a polícia viva dentro da minha casa.

Redhat has a huge consumer, the Brazilian government, a lot of developers are in brazil, etc. Cachyos (the distro I use) seems to not want to do anything, but when the law enters into action, it’s easier to just block all brazilian ips, like my computer updating. As the government can sue and do other things.

Who knows? Probably not even the legislators, but I’m already seeing every judge accepting this as everything that’s on a computer, the smartphones being represented at the app store obligation.

I’m going to install templeos.

I checked again at the law and it seems it says operating systems directly.

The law and a review for the federated world made by another user that I’m not remembering. (It’s in portuguese)

Edit:

CAPÍTULO IV

DOS MECANISMOS DE AFERIÇÃO DE IDADE

Art. 10. Os fornecedores de produtos ou serviços de tecnologia da informação direcionados a crianças e a adolescentes ou de acesso provável por eles deverão adotar mecanismos para proporcionar experiências adequadas à idade, nos termos deste Capítulo, respeitadas a autonomia progressiva e a diversidade de contextos socioeconômicos.

Only products or services that are directed at children or teenagers or with probable access to them should do age verification.

[…]

Art. 12. Os provedores de lojas de aplicações de internet e de sistemas operacionais de terminais deverão:

I – tomar medidas proporcionais, auditáveis e tecnicamente seguras para aferir a idade ou a faixa etária dos usuários, observados os princípios previstos no art. 6º da Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018 (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais);

The App Store providers and terminal operating systems should:

Give proportional, auditable and tecnically secure ways to do age verification.

Marketing account.

Your Digital Workshop. We build websites and host them, as well as create content for your social media. witty.computer

Edit: the archived page with the marketing description.