minus-squarepierre_delecto [he/him]@hexbear.nettoPrivacy@lemmy.ml•Thoughts on privacy focused smart glasses?linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·3 days agoIt would be at best, privacy for the viewer/owner but not for the viewed. Why would you buy always seeing glasses to protect the privacy of those you see? There is no such thing as a privacy respecting camera you are pointing at others. linkfedilink
minus-squarepierre_delecto [he/him]@hexbear.nettoPiracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Pirating podcasts?linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 months agoCheck out jumble.top linkfedilink
minus-squarepierre_delecto [he/him]@hexbear.nettoLinux@lemmy.ml•*Permanently Deleted*linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoit would be fine. web browser might be out of date by the time you fire it up again, but that might not be relevant for you linkfedilink
minus-squarepierre_delecto [he/him]@hexbear.nettoLinux@lemmy.ml•Phoronix: Linus Torvalds Comments On The Russian Linux Maintainers Being DelistedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up56arrow-down16·2 years agoWow, some real clown behavior from Linus. linkfedilink
It would be at best, privacy for the viewer/owner but not for the viewed. Why would you buy always seeing glasses to protect the privacy of those you see?
There is no such thing as a privacy respecting camera you are pointing at others.