

Whew good thing I only have dildos and not disldos
/j
-=@===@=-
☆ ≈ She/Her ≈ ☆
☆ ≈ 22 Years Old ≈ ☆
-=@==@==@=-
☆ ≈ Professional Catgirl :3 ≈ ☆
-=@==@=@==@=-
☆ ≈ Lesbian | Trans Fem≈ ☆
☆ ≈Gray Ace | Gray Aro ≈ ☆
-=@==@===@==@=-
☆ ≈ Pixel Artist | Herstorian ≈ ☆
-=@==@==@=-
☆ ≈ AuDHD | PTSD ≈ ☆
☆ ≈ Disabled | Plural ≈ ☆
-=@==@==@=-
☆ ≈ Professionally Silly :3 ≈ ☆
-=@==@===@====@===@==@=-
☆ ≈ Pfp is my Cyberpunk 2077 character ≈ ☆


Whew good thing I only have dildos and not disldos
/j


I’m stealing the phrase ‘Epstein class’, that’s a great way of explaining how horrific the rich and powerful are


Yes social media is a problem, however that alone does not justify banning everyone under 21 from using the entire internet. As the person who I replied to said they wanted.
Social media is its own problem that’s needs regulations to come under control.


Also since they weren’t allowed on the internet till they were 21, those 21 year olds won’t know how to act on the internet. So now there’s 21 year olds roaming around who will need to figure all that shit out. They might get other aspects of being an adult but the internet will be completely alien.
It’s like when I saw people saying kids shouldn’t be allowed into the grocery store because someone was annoyed that kids didn’t know how to behave there yet. You just create a new and larger problem where adults don’t know how to act.


I don’t think that’s the solution though, kids (including teens to some extent) can be on the internet but it requires better parenting. It’s better to monitor what they are doing online until they are like 15 or 16, maybe 17 if you have a really good reason too. Limit screen time, be around to answer questions your kid has about what they might see.
Little kids though? Absolutely should be off the internet. Anyone under 10 shouldn’t be on the internet period in my opinion. 10-12 is kinda a gray zone to me where it’s definitely up to the parents and if they think their child is ready.


I’m a cat so yes


Ah yes voter intimidation, something that only happens in healthy stable democracies of course


They have journalists still? That’s news to me


When you put it on reader mode they add in a bunch of stuff to try to guilt trip you into donating. Well maybe I wouldn’t be using reader mode if reading the article normally wasn’t so dogshit.



Dehumanizing people, totally not a thing that predates bloodshed ever. Just ignore every war ever, every genocide ever, every massacre ever…


Generations of kids going to schools which were designed to create quiet, obedient factory workers combined with a strong fascist, capitalist propaganda machine will do that.


Every single agent deserves life in prison without the possibility of parole. Don’t even let them see sunlight ever again. They deserve that for what they are doing to people.


It’s almost like you gotta teach people how to do things, that people aren’t just inherently born with all the knowledge to survive. Crazy I know.


It’s your mom’s dildo


So a 39’7” paddle would suffice


Ah I see they are setting a hearing on whether or not a person maybe getting targeted, so they can have a discussion on the grounds of it being vindictive, so a trial can be assembled to determine the obvious is infact obvious.
All of that to determine that yes, the thing that is being done out in the open, is the thing we all know it to be.


Hmmmm, is there sparkly inks? If so then sparkly and shiny is enough to convince me.


I’m also not a luddite, I’ll use pen and paper thank you very much


I hate this world so much
It’s nice to see a celebrity actually just be a decent human being and use their fortune for good. This man sponsored the women’s water polo team to go to the 2024 Paris Olympics too. Seems like he genuinely does care about women’s sports so more respect to him for also putting his money where his mouth is.