Depends on what you’re cracking, but for games there’s tons of cracked games that work great on Linux.
Depends on what you’re cracking, but for games there’s tons of cracked games that work great on Linux.

deleted by creator

All these conservative snowflakes are going to start an avalanche

Whatever table you imagine clicks to be stored in, add a column called “Using adblocker”.
Filter out any rows where that column = true.

Or, more likely, they would not include the fake clicks in their metrics at all, and marketing would never see the inflated metrics.

Blocking ads definitely doesn’t help the site get paid, that’s what I was talking about above.
For the same reason, it’s probably not doing any meaningful “poisoning” either.

If you think clicking all the ads makes a meaningful difference, then all the power to you.

It’s a cute idea, but they would just incorporate some amount of false clicks into their metrics.

Depends on the butt

I bet they were thinking of a different kind of good ones.

I don’t think there’s anything that could come out that would cause his supporters to change their minds at this point.

TIL about footnotes in markdown. Neat!

About 15, why?

Do you usually just jump into random parts of threads to weigh in with tangents?

Absolutely none of those provide unauthorized access to copyrighted media files. It’s perfectly legal to build a frontend to display publically accessible content like YouTube. It would not be legal for that app to provide public access to downloaded copies of those files on a separate server. You fundamentally don’t understand the law.
Not in that sentence, and you know it. You’re just arguing in bad faith now.
So you’re just debate trolling then, and not actually trying to have a discussion about my comment. What a surprise.
Doesn’t matter.
Of course it does, but you’ve debate trolled yourself into getting lost in the sauce.
Let me hold your hand:
There are 2 logical ways to look at this question. Either, it’s a frontend that streams directly off of AAs servers, which is bad for bandwidth and draws a lot of legal attention. Or, it’s a way to play torrents, which already exist. Odd question.

Law is not a matter of agreement, it is a matter of fact. Do you really think Google and Spotify would allow these software to exist if it were illegal?
Name a software they are allowing to exist that provides easy access to a repository of copyrighted media files.
We were not discussing bandwidth, we were discussing legality. It’s literally in the previous sentence. Keep up.
We were discussing both.
streaming remote music.
From a particular server.

Do you not know how torrents work?

Do you not understand how threads work?

Of course they will.Different thing
Neat trick.
No it is not.
Lol. Okay. Agree to disagree with copyright law then.
It doesn’t matter if it’s torrented or not.
Again, the bandwidth ramifications are dramatically different. Keep up.
You do realize you can stream torrent files?
You do realize that strengthens my point that it already exists
Plus x86 compatibility