Traffic is still gonna be e2e encrypted, not too much to gain

Just learned about KeyGuard. But I dislike their LICENSE:

All Rights Reserved

I use vaultwarden in my company - need to share some passwords/group with specific other users etc.

ipfwadm ftw

Old school

I learned from a friend how to dial in with some terminal to create an account like that manually. There were some magic numbers/strings involved, but I can’t remember details. I just remember the com port had to be set to 7n1, not 8n1 like for all other stuff I did

Very interesting read and deep insights into sabotage operations!

git init /

people are still on windows?

If the client was open source, it could be verified by inspecting this source alone. To my understanding, the clients do real end to end encryption. This is the good part. They also have some functionality to re-encrypt the data or export the secret key to let new peers take part, or so i guess. This is how your web browser can also read them after you peer it up. Now there might or might not be a function in the client, where meta can request the private key or re-encryption. This is really hard to figure out without having the source code.

good point, makes the comparison even worse %-)

You’re mixing two population averages, so you need a weighted calculation.

Let’s approximate first: France has about 67 million people out of roughly 447 million in the European Union, so ≈15% French and 85% non-French.

We set up:

Overall EU rate = weighted average 1.7=0.15⋅8+0.85⋅x

Solve:

1.7=1.2+0.85x 0.5=0.85x x≈0.59

So, among non-French Europeans, the rate is roughly 0.6 per 100,000.

That’s substantially lower than both the French rate (8) and the EU average (1.7), which makes sense given how high the French figure is relative to the rest. Also this is pretty much what I read for Vietnam in this chart.

thanks France, for ruining our numbers!

Edit: somewhere in this thread someone from France gives a perfectly good reason and connects the high starvation rate to assisted suicide. Which shines it’s light on another problem but very well explains and justifies the “starvation rate” - making this graph/comparison even more absurd.

Once the dump was complete, we transferred it to the new server using rsync over SSH. With 248 GB of compressed chunks, this was significantly faster than any other transfer method:

rsync -avz --progress /root/mydumper_backup/ root@NEW_SERVER:/root/mydumper_backup/

that’s a bit weird. rsync -z is compression, but they did compress in the mydumper export already, so this is a slow down (or neutral at best). also in my experience rsync is as fast as scp is as fast as piping anything to the tcp port on the destination etc. rsync does not win for speed but for enabling resume so to say…

besides this: nice read!

Good luck trying to make money then. Sure, people will by-pass using crypto, tor, … But this still captures 98% of the population.

3 days tops!

Lol, loser

I specifically agreed to them being bastards, obviously in this context. they are just as to blame. sure thing… I even confirmed that.

I see, you need everything spelled out.

I agreed with the acab, but also asked for credit for those who ordered it

Who gave a pass?