

0·
3 years agoYou and the person that you replied to are both wrong. Her pay is based not on company performance, it is based on how much she can game the stock market by spending capital on stock buybacks to inflate the price and get compensation via her stock options.
Rules were put in place to tax CEO incomes and suddenly CEOs didn’t get paid in taxable income anymore, instead they get paid in stock options.

I have a feeling if this detention facility is a private company and it were to be sued in a mass lawsuit from all these women being denied care, it would probably change its name after declaring bankruptcy then be back in business the next day under a new holding company.
If it is public then the men who are undoubtedly in charge of it should all be thrown in to this facility with a false positive pregnancy test on their file to serve 15 years for child endangerment themselves.