We absolutely can most people do… Also under capitalism!

We can do industrial food production without lead as well

We need 98% of our people to do other things than grow food unless we want to collapse back into the 1800s

What obligation it can’t both do nothing and create obligation which is it

Ok where is it here exactly I’ll wait

You misunderstand we can’t transition AT ALL from industrialized food without killing most people and destroying civilization because it depends on 98% of people able to do something other than food. We can’t grow enough food for everyone and we can’t use 50-80% of our labor producing food anymore.

We could dramatically decrease usage of meat or eliminate it, ship things less so we eat mostly what is available nearby most of the time, waste less, and make methods healthier and greener. We cannot do what you want.

They use a lot more disk do they actually use meaningfully more ram? Other than obviously inherently bloated web tech stuff?

Do you actually feel like Windows or Mac are more responsive with the same RAM?

I found a lot of flawed measurements which ended up measuring different things. This seems like a fairly respectable measurement even for being a few years old

https://itvision.altervista.org/linux-desktop-environments-system-usage.html

Simple environments like xfce or mate under X11 are around 600 MB. Gnome X 1300MB Gnome Wayland 1400. Seems pretty clear that gnome is a significant factor in the increase on the other hand most machines now come with 8-16

No no it doesn’t. It’s spec acknowledges that in addition to your OS you also run applications.

You can actually buy healthy food. Chicken wads shaped like dinosaurs were probably never the best option.

How do things and people get between places?

Industrial food production allows roughly 1-2% of workers to grow food for the other 98%. It is basically the foundation of modern civilization. It allows almost all persons, the majority of regions, even nations to be net importers of food either temporarily due to mischance or permanently due to specialization.

Taking this away would collapse modern civilization as effectively as if you literally nuked everyone with the death toll being similar. Worse people don’t react well to starving to death so the rest would probably mostly kill each other other ways.

The medieval society that emerged would produce little art or science but lots of potatoes and grains to support the much smaller total population.

Why do we care if anyone has room to complain?

How hard is this to understand. Women frequently feel unsafe with strange men in uncontrolled situations like alone in a car because men who are commonly bigger and stronger commonly beat and rape women. Men who are on average bigger and stronger are very rarely assaulted or raped by strange women because women are both less physically imposing and are less prone to violence and most specifically sexual violence. Whereas its not impossible or unheard for a woman to be so this is so uncommon it is rarely something people are reasonably concerned about either factually or culturally.

Did I really need to tell you any of that or did you in fact already know that. The whiners here do NOT want men to be equal and have the ability to chose men drivers they want women not to have a path to discriminate against them because THEY believe they aren’t the problem. Hell the guys who ARE the problem are also sure they aren’t the problem.

You are assuming that the cachy devs want the help of folks who have not demonstrated competence in their own project or want to do stuff how manjaro does

I’m dubious

You need a citation for many women being unsafe with random men in a car but the reverse not being true. OK buddy.

No because the presumption is that you will provide ID to your employer and they will go by whatever is on the ID when assigning rides.

It’s not. You as an employee or contractor aren’t entitled to a particular client being assigned to you against that clients wishes. Customers are allowed to pick their contractor