I like to call them Chief of Capital abbreviated cockheads.

Trump administration -> Epstein network

They might have important things to say about this matter.

Just to make my thinking clear; I view words and names as objects of challenge. If we can argue why we prefer a naming over another, then we should be allowed to use that naming. But that doesnt mean that the naming cant change again. We shouldnt be certain that a word is beyond critique, because oftentimes we cant guarantee it. It is better to swap out words on gut feeling, so that we luminate our view of the world. This will enable us to be challenged on our conceptions and be more open minded.

Ah, my bad.

I dont know what mayans would think about that. What do you think they would think about that?

Mayans lived in South America. Here Im speaking about [North America]/ Turtle Island.

It is perhaps descriptive, but America is a name that comes from colonizers. We should honor indigenous peoples by using their name for the continent.

Regarding south america, I wouldnt know what to call it.

Industrial food production is dependent on fossil fuel and is destroying the soil. It is also encouraging large scale production which is bad because

· it monopolizes food production which enables might and outcompete small scale farming.

· is homogenizing food, making it more vulnerable to mass crop failure, and decreasing the diversity of food.

· require massive infrastructures to distribute the food.

But we cant transition over night. We have to grow forth this reality by mindfully construct lettens that normalize this state of being.

Through slow transportation. This would gradually be realized as people start to take stewardship for their local communities. As we grow our own food to an increasing degree, our need to travel long distances will be reduced more and more.

The machine has granted us great amounts of goods. Hospitals, cars, safety, televisions and plains. However it has also removed ourselves from meaningful lives. We gain and loose from the machine, but in the long term, we loose.

The machine is good at aiding when the damage is imminent, but bad at prevention. I dont say heart failure is something to scough at, but the bigger picture is that we move towards more meaningful lives.

we need to take care of Earth

we cant go on like this

cars are killing the planet

no buses

We dont need cars. Cars is actually part of the unwellness. Cars require overproduction and death regardless of whether we use fossil or electrical fuel. If we just look at the local cost of cars: · they are taking away space from our communities tyat could be used to gather, helping wildlife and grow food · they normalize long distance travelling, and therefore weakening local communities · they are making our societies unsafe in the sense that we cant let children play outside · they are at odds with samlife in the sense that they are endangering wildlife.

The great thing about humans is that we are very adaptable. We arent naturally dependent on cars. We dream, and we do. So if we dream of a carfree society, we can in fact do it.

We need to stop normalizing industrial food production and instead grow our own food.

its real name is Turtle Island btw

The term sideloading default google walldom software by making software outside seem more excotic and less safe.

We can combat this by reframing the terms and making them reflect reality. Calling to engage with google walldom as bloodletting as we are giving up some of our willforce to google, where blood is a symbol of willforce. We can frame to use software outside the google walldom as bearing, as in bearing the blood instead of letting it go.

Bloodletting is to install software by using a walled software store. Bearing is to install software by using unwalled software stores.

good news for once

I like miniflux. Lightweight, web based, selfhostable, assisted hosting and compatible with third party clients.

As you say, it does fuck up might, there will be economic consequences.

But no bombs will terrorize civilians of the washington regime, no iranian soldiers will set foot on the land, no resistance movement against Iran invasion has to be organized.

All happens so far away, that one could pretend like it was not happening.

Sure, but not on Washington regimes soil.

Its not a war if other side cant retaliate, so lets not call it war, but rather raid.