pathos

Oh wow. Not only a lackey of russian propagandists, also discriminating against home instances.

This is in line with korean anti-harassment laws. Seems draconian to us but is entirely consistent with what koreans have been living with for over a decade now.

You… might read up on Popper’s essay about this.

Imagine posting this drivel, eh? xD

I didn’t go into the specifics but I was thinking more in line with prosumer friendly linux distributions that can be dropped in to replace win 10. I know stuff like linux mint exists for that case.

What we REALLY need is to curb microsoft’s market dominance. If more alternatives for OS and usable replacements for MS office em would exist, this would not be a problem and would not need to hamper innovation for the sake of back porting (the main counter-argument as a dev).

I am so happy to see my little luxembourg oppose this authoritarian power grab.

Most are just sheep, frightened by the horror stories propagated by the grifters whose actual goal is to sell them snake oil solutions afterwards to replace the distrusted actual medical solutions. Watch this happen once RFK has sufficiently abused and defanged the HHS.

Yet again more fascist ideology embraced and embodied by MAGA.

Imagine Alaska seceding to Canada because the angry orange turd couldn’t help himself 😂

You cannot be that ignorant. ‘Made in X’ in a such globalized and distributed economy is nothing but a matter of tax design.

‘Chamberlaining’ has never worked.

I’m just sorry for the wife, having to deal with such a brainwashed wimp.

What are you on about? The law I mentioned specifically means that they are excempt from measures that would go against their religious convictions unless these convictions do not withstand ‘scrutiny’.

What I am saying is that if a group of people is posing a public health risk because of their religious convictions, they should be treated as a health hazard and for example be quarantined, even against their will - if they are unwilling to compromise on these convictions.

Slippery slope arguments help tackling issues at hand how exactly? ;)

This isn’t an issue that just spontaneously arose. This has been an issue ever since the implementation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Said it before, will say it again: While I am aware that it violates the dignity of those in question, I am strongly opposed to to the excemption of people from public health measures for religious reasons. I do not care if your god commands you to suffer. If your beliefs are standing in the way of protecting uninvolved members of society, it’s your beliefs that have to take a backseat, not other lives. No exceptions, no compromise. If they do not want minding the society they exist in, they can leave.

In this timeline, madness is no dissuading argument.