It’s not okey to be adult and fall for the same headline like 4th time.

You need to be able to tell that something is wrong with this headline without anyone explaining it to you.

People are not being shamed ebought for still being on twitter.

You basicly described Uno. Which is jailed Macau.

“Vimeo. AI-powerd video platform”.

And what do we even import from US? Ads, surveillance, and AI slops?

Do it. We’ll be allies which you forget how to be.

Marketing people are known for beliving their own lies.

Aren’t you in NATO to prevent things like Russia taking shit over?

All reasoning must crumble before one prime directive: The richest can only get richer. No matter the cost.

Oh, they learned. We thought them that no one will be accountable and that the greediest will be bailed out and continue to get richer and richer. We are keeping jackals in our house, and we are giving them a pat on the head and a tasty treat every time they bite our children.

Hm? I feel like a lot of people said he did a lot of fucking things wrong.

With a few exceptions, you’re confusing cause and effect.

A Polish Parliament member was detained this way. Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs expressed concern by appealing to not travel to dangerous countries like Iran, Russia and Belarus. Israel was not mentioned.

Well, I was against the idea, but now you got me thininiking.

False dichotomy.

Also, read Witcher. It have like 9 books about it.

All people who were in the room and didn’t voice a protest should never be hired in media again.

Sorry, may be dumb, but whats onn and what is it relationship to google? Irealy like my chromcast, but it’s getting old, but I don’t want to transfer any more wealth to google. They licence it, I assume?

Personally? It was based on things you said. We allready discused it, right? And it was the only thing to.me that made sense. At least than you’d be understandably wrong, instead of stubbornly wrong. If you understand that before the campaign walking on the streets was normal and perfectly leagal and the capaign stigmatized it as a simpletons behavior of irresponsible people, than I honestly don’t understand what is the hill you chose to die on.

Yes, those are not the same and that’s exactly the point.

2nd one is me trying to understand your perspective and assumimg that you asses the irresponsibility of wondering into trafic must comr from the modern perspective in accordance with modern standards (existing traffic laws and road culture) - reality after PR campaign.

1st one is pointing out that that traffic laws and road culture were different back then, and.we.can’t even talk about “wondering into” traffic anymore than we could talk about “wondering into sidewalk” - reality before PR campaign.

Those two not being the same is the result of PR campaign changing one state of round culture to another by stigmatizing being a pedestrian on the street. That’s the problem we are discussing.

Come on.

(Man, I’m regretting biting after it was obvious this conversation is going nowhere. This time I’m truly out. Feel free to have your last word, but - hopefully - I’ll not address it)