great example of a less disruptive use of attention seeking behavior because it still parses phonetically and doesn’t require any historical knowledge.

hardly. there’s a significant difference between judging behavior and judging people.

those are some incredible assumptions to make based on that statement.

acknowledging attention seeking behavior != taking offense to it

don’t tell my bosses at nestle

one joke

howard dean was already losing when he BYAAAH’d. dan quayle was famous for the idiotic things he’d say, and he became vice president under HW bush - a strategy that bush’s son mimicked to his advantage a decade later.

gaffes didn’t end political careers, negative media coverage did. and they decide before the story happens how they’re going to spin it, no matter the actual content of the interview or speech.

bro read ‘entrepreneurial glands’ and really got mildly infuriated about it

my brother

getting an suv changed my life

i’m so tired of nothingburger feel good ‘stories’ about search trends

this really is just reddit lite

Moreover, users of the satellite receivers were involuntarily taking part in attacks and might have experienced reduced device performance during these occurrences.

the article isn’t 100% clear, but this line suggested to me that they were being used to perform attacks themselves (although it also states “Allegedly, the functionality was needed to counter the attacks of a competing entity.”)

anyone else remember low orbit ion cannon DDOSing? i guess life imitates art

edit: receivers. doy. reading comprehension is hard.

if they expect you to do a consultant’s work, they should pay you a consultant rate

b) this is a remarkable incentive to NOT acknowledge criticism. I mean, if I’m Meta and I see this often, what is the incentive to not just force everybody to EULA away as much as possible?

how incredibly fucking dishonest. profit motive is more than enough incentive for them to continue to do what they’ve already been doing for close to two decades.

“don’t boycott exceptionally shitty companies or you’re responsible when they just get worse” is possibly the worst take i’ve seen so far on lemmy.

do you struggle to play peekaboo? how do you not grasp that they’re feeding into the same software ecosystem and your data is being stored in the same database?

Because I wasn’t trying to get the best deal

then why are you mad that you didn’t get the best deal?

as a consumer product, yeah. but teams is ubiquitous in business and govt.