higgsboson
Negative. I am a meat popsicle.
- 0 Posts
- 50 Comments
6·5 months agoNo. Stop doing that.
There is no Department of War. The Dept. of Defense is named in law and would have to be renamed by Congress. Renaming it without Congress is unlawful and using any taxpayer money for it is likely illegal.
Correct. It would take Congress to change that, which it seems like they wont get. Hence, the attempted name change is unlawful and - to the extent that they use DoD resources to do it- it is also likely illegal.
No, you are mistaken at least to some extent. I work in an adjacent field to those mentioned.
There are definitely groups like that (legal aide) which are not scams; I work with them regularly, so I know with certainty that some of these groups help clients attain their desired outcome in cases where they otherwise would not have prevailed. These groups dont usually charge nearly enough to offset a lifetime of benefits from a Federal agency… which is the end goal in many such cases.
So theyre not all garbage. Unfortunately I dont really know how to tell them apart at the outset, though, and listing the ones I know would quickly ruin any persec I may have here.
In my (professional) experience, people with expert help do tend to have better outcomes when dealing with the federal bureaucracy.
I just want to reiterate: if you or a loved one are attempting to overturn an unfavorable decision, (e.g. by the VA regarding disability,) it pays to have help.
US
wardefense secretaryDespite their bullshit lies, neither Hegseth nor Trump possess the authority to rename the Department of Defense. Their attempts to do so are unlawful and we should not kowtow to them by using it.
edit: to be clear, it is established in law and therefore making the change would require another law passed by Congress.
Then it is clear to me that you lack a thorough understanding of how our legal system works.
And that you did not read the article OP posted. Youre angry with a figment of your own imagination.
Correct. It was never a law and is no longer a thing. This is just ragebait.
The thing you are angry about isnt even actually happening. This is just ragebait.
Fucking lemmings downvoting the only commenter who has an inkling of how this works.
Maybe not, but the issue in the case before the Court is moot.
e: and also, it was never a “law on the books”. Go read the thing.
I know it does happen some but it seems rare. Also anecdotal but most of the people I know who had it made like that had gotten their money as salespeople and/or at a tech startup and just kept on chasing that rabbit. Likely just a different cross-section of people who are more ambitious (or greedy.)
I’d love to see an actual study of it, especially comparing vocations.
In reality, most people dont stop once they reach “retirement money.”
Indeed, you have grasped the salient point.
Adverse inference is very much a thing.
Polygraphs and drug dogs are both proven to be bullshit and yet they still have the force of law in many places.
23·6 months agoI guess it is a good thing I dont use google, then.
Thanks. I was merely recalling my experiences as a contractor.
As I stated elsewhere in this thread, it appears this was at least manslaughter if not outright murder. Discharging a gun into an opaque door should not qualify as self-defense unless the (alleged) assailants were damned well shooting first.
From the available facts, it was not a clean shoot by any stretch. Im not familiar enough with Indiana law to know how that would play out though.
They were probably trying the wrong key in the door or something.
FYI, Wikipedia sidebar always has the latest URLs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna’s_Archive