

To protect themselves from the other armed off-duty soldiers, of course
Any resulting violence will justify the need for more guns!


To protect themselves from the other armed off-duty soldiers, of course
Any resulting violence will justify the need for more guns!
Only when it’s properly funded. But we can do that.


Damage or destroy, sure. But to me, hijacking means taking control of the aircraft, and I don’t see that happening without cockpit access. (Not that doors are impenetrable, but still.)


But they do prevent hijackings…


After Flavius Columbus, of course


Oh, they will.


Books like “A Canticle for Liebowitz”


A direct link to the relevant comment: https://lemmy.world/comment/20377671


Maybe his Special K was wearing off and he was about to feel.


If only he could watch Fiddler and realize he’s not cheering for the same people as everyone else.


WELLS FARGO??


A pile of fish guts on the TPS reports does not constitute a “lack of response”, and is therefore not a fireable offense. Any wagers?


Trump is America’s Asshole.


I wouldn’t say that he was really good, only that he’s never been better.


Or search/navigation…


He probably couldn’t have, though. Not without cheating.
1 to 5, inclusive


It doesn’t help that they drilled through the CF hull…
High demand from data centers decreases the supply for consumers, the consumer demand is unaffected.