I remember reading a few days ago that OpenAI basically ordered 3 times as much RAM as they could use this year. There are also data centers fully equipped but not turned on as the local power grid could not handle the added demand.

Well at this point you can escalate, since they escalated first after being kicked out. But you don’t start by arresting.

Why would we need an alternative to Wikipedia?

I mean there was already the Conservapedia, that’s nothing new.

To follow up on this, I never heard about someone switching to leftist ideals after brain damage, always to the right.

More like useless comment in such a thread.

Way I heard this joke, it continues with:

A real customer enters.

He asks where the toilets are.

The bar explodes.

Got it, a xenophobic bigot. I won’t engage further, you’re not worth it. I encourage others to simply block you, as I’m doing right now.

So if I understand you correctly, you’re saying that him being a Muslim makes it inevitable that he will apply Sharia law (or something equivalent) to NYC?

Just say the racist thing you’re only implying, for all of us to see.

Well, the thing is, you just admitted that your initial comment about Firefox being more vulnerable was based on nothing, since you did your research only after. Then you so quickly went over the data you looked for that you only saw that total that seemed to confirm your unfounded bias, where the tables have that very readable color code to them, making 2015 and 2016 really jump to the eye.

Of course, now that the data you found goes against your bias, you just look to discredit it, instead of thinking “you know, maybe this isn’t as clear-cut as I thought it was”.

So no, no charity there. I’ll keel it for those who act in good faith, thank you.

For starters, if I had not called you out, you wouldn’t have provided sources. So my point still stands, your previous message, unsourced, was fear mongering.

Onto your data. Funny that you wrote the total from 2015, not mentioning that 127 of those code execution vulns are from 2015 and 2016… So 8 code exec since 2017, versus 85 for Chrome. I don’t think we can attribute that only to market share.

Either you don’t know how to read a table, or you purposefully ignored that part, perhaps hoping no-one would click on your links?

almost certainly has more vulnerabilities than Chromium browsers

Unless you have real world data that confirms it, this is just fear mongering.

I see it more as a step towards banning a ton of content they don’t like by claiming they are porn, or porn-adjacent (for example any LGBTQ+ content)

You couldn’t, because there’s no actual study on this, because it does not work. It’s also why you won’t. Troll being a troll, block and move on.

Very fair. Thank you!

I agree with the part about unintended use, yes an LLM is not and should never act as a therapist. However, concerning your example with search engines, they will catch the suicide keyword and put help sources before any search result. Google does it, DDG also. I believe ChatGPT will start with such resources also on the first mention, but as OpenAI themselves say, the safety features degrade with the length of the conversation.

About this specific case, I need to find out more, but other comments on this thread say that not only the kid was in therapy, suggesting that the parents were not passive about it, but also that ChatGPT actually encouraged the kid to hide what he was going through. Considering what I was able to hide from my parents when I was a teenager, without such a tool available, I can only imagine how much harder it would be to notice the depth of what this kid was going through.

In the end I strongly believe that the company should put much stronger safety features, and if they are unable to do so correctly, then my belief is that the product should just not be available to the public. People will misuse tools, especially a tool touted as AI when it is actually a glorified autocomplete.

(Yes, I know that AI is a much larger term that also encompasses LLMs, but the actual limitations of LLMs are not well enough known by the public, and not communicated enough by the companies to the end users)

I’m honestly at a loss here, I didn’t intend to argue in bad faith, so I don’t see how I moved any goal post

Can’t argue there…

That seems way more like an argument against LLMs in general, don’t you think? If you cannot make it so it doesn’t encourage you to suicide without ruining other uses, maybe it wasn’t ready for general use?