

Because they always do, not because they have a legitimate claim.


Because they always do, not because they have a legitimate claim.


The biometrics part makes no sense, you can disable biometrics. You mean that you have to do a security confirmation however you’ve set it up.
The KDE screenshot application is super nice though, what does flameshot have that it doesn’t?


Or just keep using Firefox and don’t use the entirely optional and opt-in features you don’t need. The same as always.
I’m completely flabbergasted why people get their panties in a twist over


deleted by creator


I’ve seen a lot of stupid patent and copyright trolling over the years.
I bet 100€ that they’re trying to double dip and get valve to also pay for licensing songs that the individual game publishers already licensed.


Death it is, CSV is horrible effectively unstandardized trash that has led to uncountable hours of efforts wasted due to subtly corrupted data through incompatible serialization settings.
It actively makes the world a worse place by existing.


That’s why I commented on you including it in what I could only read as a list of objectionable things.


You’re not wrong about the rest, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the processor benchmarks really well.


That’s not an issue, IP addresses allow localization to some degree


The Californian law only affects California.
Individual OS vendors might decide to implement it in a way that affects other places as well, e.g. in the past, Valve decided they’d rather not implement age verification for Germany and just stopped selling all porn / super violent games in Germany. Maybe they’ll now implement it for Germany and California.


I have no idea what you’re talking about. The Iran? USA? Israel?
And why is it fascism? Like a lot of what has happened in the USA was pretty fascist, but starting a war isn’t part of the list. There are a few definitions of fascism (e.g. by Adorno), so which one are you using here?
What do you mean, I’m really confused here.


If I had a personal sauna, I’d invite everyone. But I’m not from puritan central (USA) so that might be a foreign concept to some readers.


It really sucks for non-developers. I can easily afford to walk out the door laughing when a place I’m interviewing for tells me I’d have to use Windows, but clearly that’s not a privilege all professions have


Yeah, as long as it made any sense to browse the web without JS. These days you need at least an allow list.


And also neither cloud-based nor LLMs


You missed the point: I quoted and linked to contemporary decision making because it illustrates that there’s no “strongarming” necessary if something is the only game in town.
Sysvinit was no longer doing the trick, Upstart wasn’t architecturally sound, OpenRC wasn’t a serious contender at that point either: they could adopt systemd or wait for a few years in case some alternative would come along.
That’s why your framing doesn’t make sense to me: it implies that there was some sort of choice that Big Init was trying to stack the cards for, but there wasn’t at that point.


No, see the reasoning why distros switched, e.g. Debian or Arch. TL;DR: technical merit, no good alternatives existed at the time, as evidence by how the Arch maintainer paraphrased the average systemd critic:
I think there might be this other project that possibly is doing something similar. I don’t really know anything about it, but I’m pretty sure it is better than systemd.
Would the landscape be more diverse if other people would have built someone when Poettering first announced systemd? Probably! Did anyone do it? No! OpenRC wasn’t a fully fledged alternative back then, Upstart had fundamental design flaws.
But does anyone regret adopting systemd? Also no! Everybody is happy. It’s robust, it works, it makes admin lives easier. Users no longer have to deal with zombies, slow boots, and unnecessary services running.
AV1. Netvc didn’t happen, and parts of Daala and Thor were integrated into AV1. Google has the only relevant patents and gave the world an irrevocable license to use it freely.
This is as close as you can get. The sisvel patent trolls will put their grubby fingers onto everything you can call “video codec”, and make up ways they can milk people stupid enough to pay them.