fatalicus

Just got my first ever warning the other day.

Was a comment about voting on using gallows or guillotines to solve some problems in the US.

Wasn’t even advocating it, just offering it as a suggestion to those living there.

You guys work on may 1st?

If the only laptops having the issues is the laptops that have Samsung share installed, why is it then Microsofts fault that an update broke something?

Apperantly they changed something in the updated that made a bug in Samsung share appearent.

So probably not a Microsoft issue, but a Samsung issue, since Samsung share is the culprit?

The problem with your argument is that while you can buy the lower res movie because you don’t need more and if a lower res doesn’t exist you can still watch the high res on your low res TV, you can’t choose to buy a lower install size game or software.

When you buy those, the size it is is usually what you will have to install to use it, and if you can’t buy a large enough storage to install it…

And in those videos he has the mask on the whole time, so your image without mask is likely fake.

That doesn’t mean that your carrier isn’t the problem.

Just like the person you replied to, I to can just log in to my carriers app on a new phone and get eSIM fixed there if my old phone is in an unusable state.

People seems to forget that football is the secondary focus of the head of FIFA. Corruption is the name of the game for him.

The main issue, and this is also mentioned in the blog post, is that the bot only does translation and not localisation.

The first is just taking the words from one language and changing to another.

The second is to actually make sure the text in the new language makes proper sense. Maybe the English article uses some analogy that does realy make sense in the new language. Localisation is to find some other suitable analogy to use instead, so that the point from the main article is kept, but it still makes sense.

The main issue there is that project zero, where if you ignore what Google has reported, they will just go ahead and disclose the issue.

Or they are just home users behind a CGNAT, which more and more ISPs use.

And even if they aren’t, home users usually have dynamic IPs, meaning it can change.

That isn’t Google owning your content though, just Google deciding what you can do with your content on their service.

You block then investigate yes.

Just like every other company in existence does it, since the first thing you want to do is stop continued spread/misuse.

Here is the post from Billet Labs themselves where they verify that they only asked for the cooler back after the video had been released: https://www.reddit.com/r/LinusTechTips/comments/18d6m3u/deleted_by_user/kcfmcnz/

Now, i’m not saying that LTT didn’t do Billet Lbs dirty in regards to this whole situation.

They did not test the cooler correctly, and Linus was less than resonable in regards to retesting and such (something he has adressed himself here: https://linustechtips.com/topic/1526180-gamers-nexus-alleges-lmg-has-insufficient-ethics-and-integrity/page/16/#comment-16078641 ).

But people keep hanging up that they sold when they were supposed to send it back, when there was no such agreement beforehand.

About Honey, they didn’t find out that Honey was scamming viewers until everyone else did.

What they found out earlier, at the same time as many other youtubers, was that Honey was “scamming” the youtubers themselves by replacing the youtubers reference codes.

At the time they thought the viewers still got discounts, so they didn’t announce anything about it since it would seem like they asked the viewers not to take the discounts so that LTT could make more money.

About the Billet Labs thing, they have shown, and Billet Labs verified it, that the original agreement was that LTT would keep the cooler.

It was only after the bad review they asked for it back, and at that point there was miss communication between the person Billet Labs talked to and the logistics department at LTT, so the cooler wasn’t set aside as it should.

What does US law matter to France in this case?

Definitely, as after this it was announced that Apple would not be affected by the 100% semiconductor tariffs.

Of course it affects the average user, if nothing else then by showing that the browser can’t be trusted.

If the people making the browser is willing to alter the Web pages people visit to steal money once, what makes you think they aren’t willing to do so again for any number of reasons?

It was a comment on your claim that brave is a great product.

Straight up scamming their users is in my opinion not something that is done by “great products”.

Other examples is that Web browser that added their own referral code when users bought stuff on a crypto exchange. Oops, that was brave as well.

Or that one that installed a paid vpn service during an update, without user consent.

You guessed it, brave that as well.