yep, takes all kinds.

he’ll change his mind if a girl he likes tells him he stinks… is it the ‘because’ he offers that upsets you or the smell he gives off?

that means i’ve reached my biannual quota of hilarious comments-- and so soon into 2025, see you in 2027 lemmy! 👋 (me realizing biannual is twice a year… its too late)

my guy looks a little like mona lisa with similar ambiguity of expression. no matter where you stand in the room, he thinks you’re palestinian.

author complains about having to repeat himself in his ranting over and over again, 2/10

read this if you like angry people yelling at you… tons of bold, italics, underlines, and even the occasional ALL CAPS

my favorite part: 1. Shut the fuck up!

musk is a piece of shit but why is this investigation in USAID’s purview?

wrong thread/

this of course after using ai to ban 2.3 million ‘security threat’ aps.

tulsi is a flawed human being, we all are- but she is not a double agent for russia. there, i said it, downvotes please.

“and feel offended if I want to concentrate on my duties instead of talking to them” this sounds like projection to me and its hard for me to shake that assessment… keeping to yourself is generally navigable and most people understand and accept others’ social orientation. are you maybe informed by a singular moment that you’re dwelling on? as for being ‘on the spectrum’ that means vastly different things from one point to the next and if it doesn’t complicate the advice people are willing to give to you, it could be a crutch you’re imbuing with more dependence than is necessary.

doesn’t that make their releasing it as open-source even more of a gift? :P

very simply, i would continue seeking dialogue because we benefit from multiple points of view. if you can’t always find fruitful dialogue, analyze your beliefs and attempt to find patterns and underlying explanations that might come out of your personal experience- and steelman your opponents by assuming they have subjective realities that led them to theirs.

higher among children in households earning less than 100k and among children of “parents with an education level of an associate’s degree or less.”

the first cohort broadly implies the second so its inclusion seems unnecessary/redundant

big tech?

the consolidation of platforms has been happening through both democratic and republican administrations. be honest.

soon it will be 6. then you cannot say such things!

no, i’m not a bot. i left my ‘take’ and that’s why we’re in this mess. we’re all victims of some kind of programming, though… so there’s a shred if truth in your incredulity.

well, we do live in a society.

see, i have a different take-- the democrats lost my vote. period.

how long is this conversation now? what do you intend to achieve here?