I got shocked the other day stepping on live wires… I now have a degree in Electrical Engineering. (Actually Not: My experience is not the same as expertise)

We’re forced to speculate due to a lack of insider knowledge

You mean you want people to believe unsubstantiated claims that lack evidence?

but we can use context clues like the fact that other nations are using social media for the same purpose and it originating in China, a fellow world superpower, to reason that they would be using it for similar purposes. Why wouldn’t they be using an effective tool like this? This stuff isn’t being created for altruistic reasons.

Still don’t see any argument that justifies substituting “could/would” with “is” except vague notion of “we do it, so they’re definitely doing it”

as a CS grad and having worked in software for 10 yrs… this is just delusion.

this claim is totally different from “TikTok is Chinese propaganda”.

“Could/Would” is not the same as “is”

well yes, I was arguing what HazardousBanjo said. I am on voyager. My initial comment to their parent comment is below yours and the comment from luthis, but not in reply to you.

because advocating against the current DNC establishment is a necessary step to take to stopping the rachet and pinion mechanism. As long as people like chuck schumer exist in the party you can’t be serious about change while advocating to “vote blue no matter who”

vote for him in the next election too? I don’t know i am just predicting what USians will do.

no its the otherway around. vivian was birthed from sex selective IVF and the reason he got unhinged when she came out as trans in 2020

I suppose this is a convenient go to to keep the status quo for people who speak about doing good things but don’t want to rock the boat. When change through peaceful means becomes impossible then non-peaceful events start to take place, and there won’t be any order compared to planned and coordinated transition away from the awful systems in place. Would you like to live through that instead?

Also some random dude running a bodega is not an oligarchy but nobody said it was. Oligarchies exist and their destruction is necessary for actually competitive free markets so the random dude with a bodega is not driven out of business in the first place.

we used to do that fine before the conception of the word “corporation”

Why would you argue that we should stop doing our duties once we have cast our ballot and the candidate we support won?

but be very careful of labelling people puritanical. Everybody draws lines that when crossed make the other person untrustworthy. This should be encouraged for a healthy democracy.

Notice how the proletariat tends to win when we don’t engage in puritanical politics based off of red fascism.

I disagree. This just comes off as a half-truth. Mamdani actually is far and away the most pure candidate apart from Bernie Sanders in the whole of US politics.

what according to you is “puritanical politics based off of red facism”?

The people want inclusivity, better welfare for the working class people, better overall healthcare, debt-burden free education and we don’t want a government that’s corporate leaning, takes money from foreign interests, arrests citizens for no explainable reason, fucks up the planet for the profits of a few. We don’t want governments that support genocide, slavery or other atrocities at home or abroad.

Which part of this is “red facism”?

my very limited (I just stumbled across this article) understanding is less push back from the state over closed cases. It maybe also helps to establish precedent by overturning wrongful convictions and presenting evidence to the judge in current cases to give them pause before they condemn an innocent to death.

no… trying to live forever is capitalist. It’s in tune with injecting oneself with the plasma of youth, obssessing over telomeres and likewise being unwilling to let go of their insatiable life of greed

even aging is capitalist bullshit

put it inside a cage and connect your own wifi router from outside to the LAN ports.

that’s quite dishonest because LLMs have had all manner of facts pre-trained on it with datacenters all over the world catering to it. If you think it can learn in the real world without many many iterations and it still needs pushing and proding on simple tasks that humans perform then I am not convinced.

It’s like saying a chess playing computer program like stockfish is a good indicator of intelligence because it knows to play chess but you forgot that the human chess players’ expertise was used to train it and understand what makes a good chess program.

Bazzinga

“embodies the elegance of simplicity”

corporate speak that doesn’t mean anything. Also If you are talking to the creator of a programming language they already know that. That was the goal of the language.

“Plan 9 from bell labs, another landmark achievement”

the sentence is framed as if its a school essay where the teacher asked the question “describe the evolution of unix and linux in 300 words”

“The sam and Acme editors which showcase your philosophy of powerful, minimal design”

Again explaining how good software is to the author. Also note how this sentence could have been a question in a school essay: “What are the design philosopies behind the sam and acme editors?”