Kids will often just repeat what they’ve heard to adults.

But the largest problems to these laws is the way they affected minority groups. If followed, the law would disproportionately affect disabled and queer teens who may suddenly be unable to access help and community.

I suspect there’s some selection bias in the kids you’re speaking to.

Can’t define something like that when they know it’s subjective.

It’s exactly the way they said drug dealers would work

One step closer to the ferengi ideal.

No doubt in response to Europe making its choice for software open source. Expect targeted attacks on FOSS to increase

I can’t access the paper but a lot of people are drawing wild conclusions from it and misrepresenting what’s there.

In short, what I could find was, they asked 40 employees from a tech startup about their AI use.

They did no comparison study or experiment.

If I had to guess the tech startup probably works in AI as well. Not exactly an unbiased study.

Quit? Only a fool would waste their time on it.

This is the thing I’m most afraid of. It’s why I’ve been moving everything to self hosting and de-googling.

Yup.

Demonstrate a single false claim

The fact AI has yet to do anything other than increase costs, increase the time taken to ship anything (particularly code), decrease trust and socialise the cost of data centres and electricity…

I’d say it’s an all of us problem and a fucking stupid problem to have.

That’s not a use case for users. That’s a use case for a very specific sub group who likely weren’t using the OS at all. Not saying it’s not good they would be able to if that works for them, which I doubt.

Its still not a reason to foist it onto all of us

How many misunderstandings happen because people are bad at both writing and talking?

The answer is, a great deal.

Your answer is nonsense.

There is no real use case for the user. There are only use cases for the company.

I don’t think it’s solely for that reason. There are privacy concerns and concerns the os could be used for the MIC.

Suggestions of the nanny state never come up here. The dichotomy of what were expected to do for ourselves vs what they say the nanny state does are a vast ocean filled with bullshit Republican rhetoric

Can’t wait to see them age gate their own transphobic policies

I’ll bet.

R placing a bad system with a worse system does not solve the problem

Nothing is ever as secure and private as promised.

None of what you said addresses the problem I mentioned.

Not when exchanges still govern taking money out. They are businesses like everything else and will be just as risk averse