Seems like it.

Reminds me of the Cloudflare incident this year.

And the Cloudflare incident also this year.

It’s a cargo-cult for stock price manipulation.

Yes, but this particular abusive feature is a result of misguided legislation, not profit-seeking.

Removed by mod

all that invested money vanishes

Well it’s mostly going directly to the hardware vendors (Nvidia) and infrastructure providers (Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud et al.).

The usual problems with parsing ls don’t happen here because Nu’s ls builtin returns properly typed data.

Isn’t that the point that the previous commenter was making by linking that answer? I read their comment as “here is why you should use Nu shell instead of parsing ls output.”

This guy is a sex pest.

Sorry to be a doofus, but could you paste the output of iptables-save and ip6tables-save instead? The default iptables output actually just leaves out important information like which interface the rule applies to.

I think the best thing to do would be to see if you can get support from Windscribe and find out whether it’s a known issue or a bug that needs fixing.

Thanks, looking at it now, but I should have remembered, iptables has a separate tool for ipv6 called ip6tables. Could you also paste the output of

ip6tables -L

If you put it in the comment between backticks like this:

```
<paste here>
```

then it will keep the formatting exactly as it was when you copied it, instead of munging the linebreaks.

Check your cron and systemd timers to see if a regular scheduled job is running at that time.

It might help if you paste a complete dump of your firewall rules. I’m not sure if ufw uses iptables of netfilter since I haven’t used it before, but you can do:

for iptables firewalls:

iptables -L

for netfilter firewalls:

nft list ruleset

That might help debug exactly what ufw and your vpn are doing.

Yes we’ve known this about capitalism and automation for centuries. My point (that you’re ignoring) is that LLMs will not give us any kind of automation worthy of discussion in that context.

Except perhaps for shitty SEO recipe website automation.

All of these doomers are talking about the consequences of true AGI.

On the one hand, we don’t have true AGI, and probably won’t for a while yet.

On the other hand, we are so behind with regulating tech that if we do develop AGI we will certainly be completely unprepared for the consequences despite all these doomers telling everybody exactly what could go wrong. And they will be right.

Fingers crossed it doesn’t happen in our lifetimes.

lichess good

What’s best for the website owners is to have people actually visit and interact with their website. Blocking AI tools is consistent with that.

Write to your representatives.

Please give more funding money, it’s only 10 years away UwU

How old was the child? Are you fuckers going to make me read the article?