dream_weasel

Sure, nature writ large is resilient and adaptable.

Individual species die off all the time. Sometimes for stupid reasons.

“Ma-gai-tees”

Not sure how you meant it, but every turn of “magaites” is overwhelmingly dumb tbf. I take and agree with your point, but try again and try harder.

Time to learn hexadecimals and how to potato I guess.

Straight to the bootyhole.

2. Put your junk in that box!

You should be all the way joking because giving this sort of agency to an LLM shows an all the way misunderstanding of what they are and how they work.

You not alone in these feelings, but just like the title of the article, they are fundamentally misguided.

The difference is, when a LLM tells you, it’s news.

Besides, what are you gonna do if you ask AI how many rocks to eat? NOT eat rocks? People can’t handle responsibility like that.

Supposing the prices they charge are still less than what you would pay for the convenience of purchasing a product with no extra effort, why would you switch?

I have myself had aspirations to buy fewer things from Amazon. However. Even including stuff like this, I am happy to pay $10 extra to not have to dick around.

I hope Amazon has to pay money for this and that it hurts their business model, bit as a customer they are still scratching my itch 2 times out of 3.

I would like to remove the word “slop” from common speech for overuse. Sorry for your jack stand experience.

You can think whatever you like. It doesn’t seem cut and dry, even by known and overwhelming prevalence of Texas honor killings and alcoholics who are overwhelmed by 2 glasses of wine.

Indistinguishable facts from just an inexperienced idiot gun owner.

Get a better ad blocker, I don’t pay for BBC and I can see the whole thing. Also don’t be a twat, there’s no need for it.

You can believe whatever you like, but the title of the article should match the content, and you should read the content before you decide. It sounds like you did read it so good on you.

Based on my read of it, there’s definitely enough reasonable doubt that I’m not comfortable saying this guy murdered his daughter based on the content provided. I updated my original comment to say why.

The article literally says it’s a Glock 9mm. It also says 2 500 mL boxes whoch he claims to have had 1. That’s like 2/3 a bottle, not like a box of franzia. I appreciate being a lifelong shooter (me too), but this was the dudes first gun, and he’s a British immigrant as an adult. All of it taken together, yeah seems like reasonable doubt to me.

You could find the details by reading the whole article.

Then you apparently didn’t read it.

It was a negligent discharge unrelated to the argument. This is a shitty article title and dad is a shitty gun owner and shitty dad tbf, but it wasnt political thing. You can really tell in the comments who read the whole article and who just started commenting. Even the summary doesn’t cover it right.

Edit:

Rather than keep rewriting, this dude is an asshole, however:

1. There was no indictment by grand jury. That means they went through jury selection and heard evidence and a majority of the jurors were not convinced. Counsel for defense AND prosecution agree to jurors, so it’s not like it’s a maga convention or a police department.
2. 500 mL of wine (if verified) is 2/3 of a bottle, not drunk alcoholic rage quantity see 1. If he blew like 0.4, it seems to me it would be reported as part of the article.
3. The guy bought one gun and is a Brit, not a born and raised gun toting southerner.
4. Reasonable doubt. While I’m as big an antifer as the next guy on Lemmy, nothing good comes from jumping to conclusions and misrepresenting the facts of the situation by sensationalizing the title or not putting all the information in the summary. Again, see 1.

Garbage.

Tell me the average of all people who have more than zero (and the number that represents), then tell me how many have zero.

This number 955 doesn’t mean shit.

hunter2.h2

But HOW did they walk? Did they do it brown or immigranty-like?

Ok that’s probably true enough

Not all of us