This part applies to all customers:

v. Use of Your Content. As part of providing the AI services, Microsoft will process and store your inputs to the service as well as output from the service, for purposes of monitoring for and preventing abusive or harmful uses or outputs of the service.

And while Microsoft has many variations of licensing terms for different jurisdictions and market segments, what they generally promise to opted-out enterprise customers is that they won’t use their inputs to train “public foundation models”. They’re still retaining those inputs, and they reserve the right to use them for training proprietary or specialized models, like safety-filters or summarizers meant to act as part of their broader AI platform, which could leak down the line.

That’s also assuming Microsoft are competent, good-faith actors — which they definitely aren’t.

This is some pathetic chuddery you’re spewing…

You wouldn’t assume that QA can read every email you send through their mail servers ”just because”

I absolutely would, and Microsoft explicitly maintains the right to do that in their standard T&C, both for emails and for any data passed through their AI products.

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/servicesagreement#14s_AIServices

v. Use of Your Content. As part of providing the AI services, Microsoft will process and store your inputs to the service as well as output from the service, for purposes of monitoring for and preventing abusive or harmful uses or outputs of the service.

We don’t own Your Content, but we may use Your Content to operate Copilot and improve it. By using Copilot, you grant us permission to use Your Content, which means we can copy, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform, edit, translate, and reformat it, and we can give those same rights to others who work on our behalf.

We get to decide whether to use Your Content, and we don’t have to pay you, ask your permission, or tell you when we do.

Your general understanding is entirely correct, but:

Microsoft is almost certainly recording these summarization requests for QA and future training runs; that’s where the leakage would happen.

Why do we pretend like it’s necessary to have a CIA as part of the U.S. government? Between the nepotism and complete lack of public accountability they justify by claiming it’s necessary to “protect America,” they might as well just be a private corporation.

It really seems like the entire purpose of the agency is just to help rich people in the U.S. do fucked up shit at home and around the globe to destroy democracy in the name of “spreading democracy.”

There’s a book I love called The Very Best Men by Evan Thomas that shares this thesis. The author is a well-regarded Washington journalist and insider who was given access to the CIA’s archives.

He starts off by playing the title straight, humanizing his main subjects, explaining their ideological motives and justifications, and playing up their esteemed credentials and education. Then he goes into the practical effects of their actions and shows that in practice, they were terrible people who pumped out a steady stream of incompetent gaffes, own-goals, and international crimes.

There’s a very similar vibe to the Epstein files: The shadowy kabbalic figures were, in the cold light of day, grade A morons and it’s a miracle they had any success covering their tracks at all.

It’s just a meme site that was posted to HN and took off.

No investors or purpose beyond putting a pool of chatbots together and watching the slop proliferate.

BOY do I have some bad news.

https://www.lemkininstitute.com/single-post/mass-grave-complex-mgc-identification-and-analysis-of-grave-site-candidates-gsc-1-2-at-cecot

The author:

Retired USAF combat medic with extensive real-world experience as a mass grave complex investigator and genocide site analyst.

It’s honestly a pretty good rallying call. I recently retired the OG sign, but this has been my go-to protest slogan for the past year, inspired by Musk:

You have every right not to watch the video. But opining about other people’s reaction to the video without watching it is unacceptable.

Take your safe-space mindset and opinions about media you haven’t consumed back to Tumblr, please.

Truly incredible that you’re proud of your ignorance, and blindly sharing your opinions about how people should be acting more moderately: https://lemmy.world/post/42098476/21740923

You’re an embarrassment to yourself.

Did you personally watch the video before coming to that assessment?

Please show us a demo of your Home Depot DIY.

I’ve talked about it before on here, but I’ll say it again because it hasn’t seen much press coverage:

I work on safety-critical biotech software regulated by the FDA. As of this year, the FDA started using LLMs to automatically review our submissions.

The FDA has been totally public about it, but it doesn’t take a genius to see how this scheme might land sideways.

*Adding some quality references:

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-expands-artificial-intelligence-capabilities-agentic-ai-deployment

https://www.pharmaceuticalonline.com/doc/a-look-at-elsa-the-fda-s-new-ai-digital-assistant-0001

https://arstechnica.com/health/2025/06/fda-rushed-out-agency-wide-ai-tool-its-not-going-well/

Lobste.rs might be up your alley.

Did I miss something? They didn’t post any real evidence at all unless there was a link I didn’t find.

What the post is describing sounds exactly like the post getting flagged by users, then uncensored by the mod team later on.

I’m both an HN user of more than a decade, AND a massive HN hater. I’m predisposed to assume the worst, but there’s very little meat to this allegation.

To spare anyone else the click, this is about one blogger malding that his flamebait posts got flagged.

First post cited was about leaving Element/Matrix because they’re bad, second was an Omarchy showcase.

Oh no!

Guess we’ll have to attainder Musk to make up the difference.

Since no one has mentioned it yet:

Delta-8 has a weaker binding affinity to cannabinoid receptors than delta-9, meaning it’s less potent per unit dose, but also harder to green out on.

In political science and philosophy terms, that’s more precisely called Classical Liberalism or Civil Libertarianism, whereas in common American parlance, the unqualified term “liberal” has become colloquially tied to Neoliberalism.

You can fight that if you want, but the ship left the harbor decades ago.

Out of respect for the mods, lemme just say:

(Pre-emptively) Removed by author

The problem isn’t the kids, it’s the old fucks in charge.

A brief visit to College Station will fiercely dispel that notion. Most aggies regardless of age are in favor of this.