Lol this stuff makes me laugh.

#1 as other said, this is the CIA. It being internal means nothing, that’s likely even part of the game they’re playing.

#2 people who met Stalin, worked and lived around him, were afraid. People went missing. He absolutely was not good at all, Lenin didn’t even like him.

Literally so dumb from whatever end you look at.

lol ok propaganda bot i know you get accused of that far more than I no matter how many of your little friends you try to dog pile with fucko

get sources

it’s true you just don’t check your own sources lol

i did. you didn’t dopey

Sources

Why can’t you give me real sources?

Propaganda

funny because last time you did the same thing

https://lemmy.wtf/comment/5805077

Where are Feng’s legs and why does following your sources result in finding information that completely contradicts what you say?

Propaganda bots lol

so no real sources?

Okay find sources because what you offer literally says the opposite. Lol I’d be embarrassed to be you

This link he provided uses sources that completely contradict what he is saying check it out it is hilarious.

It quotes these articles, this is also what you find throughout both links he provided.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8057762.stm

There was no Tiananmen Square massacre, but there was a Beijing massacre.

The shorthand we often use of the “Tiananmen Square protests” of 1989 gives the impression that this was just a Beijing issue. It was not.

Protests occurred in almost every city in China (even in a town on the edge of the Gobi desert).

What happened in 1989 was by far the most widespread pro-democracy upheaval in communist China’s history. It was also by far the bloodiest suppression of peaceful dissent.

James Miles is now the Beijing correspondent of The Economist, and author of The Legacy of Tiananmen: China in Disarray (University of Michigan Press, 1996).

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/there-was-no-tiananmen-square-massacre/

Some have found it uncomfortable that all this conforms with what the Chinese government has always claimed, perhaps with a bit of sophistry: that there was no “massacre in Tiananmen Square.”

But there’s no question many people were killed by the army that night around Tiananmen Square, and on the way to it — mostly in the western part of Beijing. Maybe, for some, comfort can be taken in the fact that the government denies that, too.

This story was filed by CBS News correspondent Richard Roth, who was detained by Chinese authorities for 20 hours on June 4, 1989, while covering the Tiananmen Square “crackdown”.

The entire argument is no media personnel saw the events in Tianamen Square, THE SPECIFIC SQUARE, so calling it the Tiananmen Square Massacre is a lie since nobody saw anyone be massacred in THE SPECIFIC SQUARE. But read the accounts yourself, they say absolutely there was a very violent crackdown and many people were killed.

These are links YOU provided and this is all you find on these two links YOU provided. It is so weak flimsy and pathetic. Sure nobody saw a massacre in the square specifically but we know it was a bloody crackdown.

Where are Fang Zheng’s legs bro?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fang_Zheng

Help I’m desperately clutching at straws!

• you who routinely gets outted as a propaganda pusher who also can’t even talk about Tiananmen Square

I disagree, taking people’s lives especially premeditated like this surrenders your rights to our society in my book. And for some people, they don’t get to just live in a prison forever.

If the state had the ability to end his life a week before he killed, the minute he was attempting to kill or an hour after he killed would you still say they had no right then?

What has changed in the period of those times to now?

link?

for supporting teachers and all