ObjectivityIncarnate

There is no actual sentiment in the image, lol. On its face, it’s just stating two facts, not explicitly criticizing anything.

One could feasibly spread the exact same image as a positive thing, just depends on the audience.

$74,250 per employee

Hm, is this low for this line of work? Genuinely asking.

You’re equivocating “guilt” as in feeling at fault/remorseful about doing something immoral (the definition you used), with “guilt” as in it being proven that she violated a law (the definition @chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world used).

The OP says “doesn’t work”, not ‘does work but not enough to satisfy an arbitrary threshold of “working for a living” so it doesn’t count’.

Nobody is saying owners do literally no labor

The OP literally says “doesn’t work”. Is “doesn’t work” not equivalent to “no labor”?

wanting to sound like an adult when making a genuine criticism is bootlicking

???

1. The fact that “mocking terms” is even in your ‘playbook’ to begin with, speaks volumes about you.
2. Acting like “y’all” is a component of some high-minded satire is genuinely hilarious. Who do you think you’re kidding?

Each more pathetic than the last, it’s always a hallmark of an infantile mind not worth engaging with, in my experience.

Mature adults can talk about people they don’t like without this stupid playground nonsense.

Asinine ‘doodyhead’-tier ‘nicknames’ for people you don’t like are never appropriate, once you’ve reached a double-digit age. Grow up.

That’s a straw man, so I’m not going to bother responding beyond pointing out the fallacy. Consider engaging with what I actually said.

No. Also I specifically used the ‘90% of their income’ figure and not the 95% one shortly mentioned thereafter, because I think it’s fair that even those who are struggling the most ought to be able to have some ‘fun’ with their money.

But most people do earn enough to pay for their necessities, have fun, and save. And many people don’t save for later, even though they easily can, in the name of putting more on the ‘fun’ pile.

Not a bad guess at all.

deleted by creator

It’s relevant context to know that while about 67% of people self-report that they are living “paycheck to paycheck” (meaning they are not actively saving any money), only 30% self-report that they are actually spending more than 90% of their income on necessities.

Point being that the majority of people who aren’t actively saving, are choosing not to, spending all of their extra income instead of saving at least some of it.

As bad as conditions are overall, a significant chunk of people are making it needlessly worse for themselves, and things are not quite as dire as they’re made to seem by sensationalist media that’s quick to report that 67% figure, but never focuses on the 30% one that’s a much better indicator of the percentage of people who are actually having trouble making ends meet.

He’s likely going to have mental health issues now

Now?

So the acts depicted in that photo and described in that article, is not at all on the same level as the things ICE is being criticized for?

https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/11/04/us-ice-abuses-in-los-angeles-set-stage-for-other-cities

Does that hand on the left look white to you?

I’m afraid you’ve been propagandized successfully. There are plenty of non-white ICE agents.

Source?

What an idiotic article, from the headline down.

Locally replacing some letters with some other letters is going to make Microsoft’s CEO cry? Really?

Also, I’ll not be using Chrome, lol.