For what its worth, I agree with your analysis.
My point was just that you are responding to me as though my question is somehow a challenge.
I can see how you might have interpreted it that way, but its also just not what I said at all.
It matters because that’s what you implied. I wanted to know if you knew something I don’t. I didn’t make any claims about foul play. I didn’t assume anything, but it seems you might have made some assumptions.
Did they have high blood alcohol?
Congrats!
What capabilities?
Vscodium might be an option for you
I bet it happened.
Or for expats who buy a phone in their new country and cant access their apps anymore. Even worse as more businesses require the use of their app for certain things and don’t offer a web app.
So right now, I assume, the store content is based on your apple account country not your geolocation?
How can a heat pump have no moving parts?l
This is an interesting idea:
The “at least one” in the prompt is deliberately aggressive, and seems likely to force hallucinations in case an article is definitely error-free. So, while the sample here (running the prompt only once against a small set of articles) would still be too small for it, it might be interesting to investigate using this prompt to produce a kind of article quality metric: If it repeatedly results only in invalid error findings (i.e. what a human reviewer
Disagrees with), that should indicate that the article is less likely to contain factual errors
I see you’ve also purchased a new scratching post
I think philosophers around that time often did this especially if they were using a word in a way it is not usually used.
I’m uninformed about this, do you have any sources handy?
A standardized magnetic pogo pin connector
That’s something I hadn’t considered before. What a neat idea.
A lot overboard, really. There is a long way to go for truth and reconciliation.
As for data safety, its not looking too great: https://tuta.com/blog/canada-bill-c2-surveillance
I’m not sure it’s alarmist; I think this is all a breaking change is.
Anybody updating needs to know their existing config may not longer be supported. Even if the consequences are small, even if not every user will be affected, this update will break some previously acceptable configs. I think that warrants a heads up and a reminder to read the release notes.
I was bracing myself for some level of absurdity after this disclaimer.
Instead it seemed to be pretty reasonably complicated. They didn’t flash some custom firmware or even mess with the hardware at all.
Sure, it is complicated, but in terms of hacks it seems to be par for the course.
Almost like the old internet is still in there somewhere. Just gotta sort through all the shit first.