I always thought this was super on purpose. Is it not intentional design for “child protection?”

They probably don’t have to worry about out title ix for too much longer…

Dammit, lol. Autocorrect got me and I didn’t notice.

Occam’s Razor is that the simplest answer is probably right.

You’re thinking of Hanson’s razor which states:

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

I will never give this useless fuck any excuse for the intentional murder he committed.

he can’t properly identify risks.

Give me a fucking break.

Is there an OLED tv on the market now that doesn’t just exist to sell ads?

110% right. What a stupid article.