You guys are having own hostname in hosts file?
You guys are having own hostname in hosts file?


Built-in on Kagi, with community database


I had a different purpose for my notes, so I made a webpage with a filter by rating. It’s decoupled from video files, but I only keep a few video files anyway.


I think it has a narrower scope, a standardized way to access data for applications which are simply delivered over Internet. As an example: “I want to have a diary editor, but I don’t want to download and install a local app, and neither do I want some external server to access my diary text”. Then you get the running code as a PWA, but the data never leaves your computer (or other trusted storage).


There are other websites selling music for downloading, like Qobuz


When asking my first open question I did expect you to say something about ethics of buying on Amazon. I didn’t expect, however, that Amazon doesn’t sell mp3 in Canada. I’m sorry about the licensing bullshit leading to this.
I avoid Amazon in everything bad they’re doing. But they do the right thing with mp3 music, and I support that in the hopes that more ethical companies will see the truth and start selling it too.


Have you considered buying MP3s on Amazon? This is what I do normally.


Just curious: why music?
Is it much different from etckeeper?
Here’s what I meant https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/end-of-support-firefox-lockwise
I thought Mozilla also has a separate app for passwords
In my experience the kagi translator was the best


I will really appreciate the irony when it turns out that it’s the new implementation in Rust that is correct


I’m not a native English speaker, but neither people nor other robots have problems understanding me - in person or over a microphone. Speech Note hadn’t shown good results, unfortunately. I really wanted to use it, because on my Android phone I use voice input all the time.
For Framework, they just need to release a screen. They did that for 13, and you can just replace it.
Your words made me look again into the documentation:
If your APT configuration mentions additional sources besides bookworm, or if you have installed packages from other releases or from third parties, then to ensure a reliable upgrade process you may wish to begin by removing these complicating factors.
I hadn’t realized that “removing these complicating factors” meant removing these packages, not just disabling their repositories. The wording is terribly vague.
Now I don’t say anything against your experience and the conclusions it has led you to.
But my experience was that only repositories were automatically disabled and packages stayed in their place. The upgrades went through smoothly, things did not break. Were I forced to uninstall these packages and look for their replacements afterwards, I’d be quite annoyed. Maybe not as much as you, when you were forced to reinstall the system.
I’ll conclude for myself that both paths can lead to happy outcomes as well as to poor outcomes. Thank you for sharing!
Well, people do not follow instructions and their systems get broken 🤷 To a much larger extent than an orphaned package
I had smooth sailing with Ubuntu for many years, but I don’t judge other people’s choices
I just wanted to say that at a volume of an Olympic swimming pool of 2500 m³, and a density of plutonium of 19.85 g/cm³, a pool can contain about ridiculous 50,000 tons of plutonium