This is the second time I’m hearing stark criticism of The Canary. Thanks for the info, I’ll try to be more critical with their stories.

Damn, what a compliment. Thank you.

I’m also puzzled by this choice of words.

Looking at the study, ‘female’, or ‘feminisation’/‘feminization’ isn’t used once. But ‘oestrogen’ appears a lot. I guess some of these materials interfere with hormone activity and they call that feminisation? Still puzzled.

Bisphenols: Mostly used in the manufacturing of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins, bisphenols are endocrine disruptors that mimic oestrogen , potentially leading to metabolic disorders, reproduc- tive issues, and increased cancer risk even at trace concentrations (Maffini et al., 2006; Rochester & Bolden, 2015)

PhP (Triphenyl phosphate): The most prevalent OPFR in our samples, TPhP is a confirmed endocrine disruptor (Hu et al., 2023; Li et al., 2025). It interferes with oestrogen and thyroid hormone axes (Ji et al.,

2022. and is linked to obesity and metabolic changes (Wang et al., 2019)

BPA (Bisphenol A): Binds to oestrogen receptors and alters gene expression and hormone activity (Alon- so-Magdalena et al., 2012). BPA has been detected in amniotic fluid, placental tissue, and umbilical cord blood, indicating transplacental transfer. Studies have confirmed that BPA can migrate from synthetic materials into artificial sweat (Wang et al., 2019), and dermal absorption is well established (Toner et al., 2018). These findings led to the EU ban of BPA in thermal receipt paper in 2020, although it has been widely substituted with BPS (ECHA, 2020)

BPAF (Bisphenol AF): Demonstrates stronger oestrogenic activity than BPA and is increasingly used in thermal paper and plastic applications (Moreman et al., 2017)

RDP (Resorcinol bis(diphenyl phosphate)): Used as a substitute to TPhP, RDP is an emerging neurotox- in and acts as an endocrine disruptor that interferes with thyroid and oestrogen pathways. It has been linked to metabolic imbalances in animal studies (Xie et al., 2023). Scientists report stronger oestrogen- ic effects than TPhP and RDP´s exposure showing metabolic disorders in rats and their offspring (Liu et al., 2023).

Well, unless you wanna reach more people and/or be more inclusive. It doesn’t seem to have alt-text, and I also haven’t seen the picture before or know who this is.

Oh, you mean the email exchanges between the FBI that are included in the newly released files. I didn’t look at it deeply enough yet. But I’m guessing even if they have/had some degree of security in their mailing system, since those emails are relevant to the case, they were required to be added to the dossier regardless at some point.

Yup.

https://www.jmail.world/

Yeah, I admit my comment isn’t that clear.

By ‘like light and shadow’, I mean the same way decent people under oppression use the same lawyers fighting David vs Goliath battles, oppressors also use their same ethically challenged lawyers.

Quite unlikely, I think. At least in the sense that they lured him into the scene to help someone and then murder him. As that would be quite a bit more elaborate.

Since all the ICE offenders enjoy unjustifiable anonymity by the administration, it’s not easy to see if any of the thugs from those two events were the same. As the second possibility would be that when he came to help, someone recognized him, and being the man-children they are, then shot him. Either this, or they simply did loser thug things in the spur of the moment.

Like light and shadow.

Zionist David Schoen, who defend Donald Trump at his second impeachment trial, was also to represent Jeffrey Epstein

Oh, and that guy also represented Steve Bannon.

There has to be a point where people look in the mirror and realise whatever qualms they have against going out into the street doesn’t hold up vs the future that’s coming for them personally, if they don’t try something.

Thanks, done :)

Good info, I’ll just add that I don’t see anything wrong with this article in particular.

I believe this is the full article. It’s the first time I’ve visited this site, so I can’t say anything that.

Light will continue to shine on truth, no matter what.

This is so bad. Lmao.

Sure, there is some truth thrown around here and there. Yes, positive affirmations are a thing. But so much rubbish as well.

The site looks so incredibly untrustworthy and unprofessional as well. I think you’re better served looking elsewhere for health advice.

هذا سيء للغاية. ههه.

صحيح أن فيه بعض الحقيقة هنا وهناك. نعم، التوكيدات الإيجابية موجودة. لكن فيه الكثير من الهراء أيضاً.

الموقع يبدو غير موثوق وغير احترافي على الإطلاق. أنصحك بالبحث عن نصائح صحية في مكان آخر.

I feel like it’s more important than ever to partition/set-up feeds to only see politics when one wants to.

Absolute madness. The really bad kind.

Very well put. Thank you.

It has changed a lot. It’s no longer just magazines, or getting a physical copy of a DVD. It’s plastered over the internet a few clicks away, with even more brainwashy algorithms to keep people coming back.

This is a big difference from the perspective of addiction psychology.

Why the rise? Maybe because an entire generation grew up with this kind of porn, maybe because there are therapists for this now and it’s not as stigmatized.

Maybe with the male loneliness epidemic it’s even more amplified, esp. for misogynists or cluster c men.

Maybe because porn has also been more normalized with PornHub merch, adverts and giftcards.

Really, I feel like if there’s a genuine interest to know, one can just start searching the web for porn addiction papers, etc.

Or to argue the point of propaganda, look at the BACP, and other parties mentioned in the article and consider how much sense it makes after.

FWIW the only thing that raises my eyebrows in the article is that they want the government to look at the problem. Expected to a degree from an org like BACP, but they aren’t going to invest in community resources. to help with understanding and support first and foremost, and then hold platforms accountable like they should game platforms with lootboxes and such etc… So I’d give them more credit if they offered the direct ways to help the problem. As the government, without direction only seems to know punish, block, ban.

Food for thought, I’m off to sleep and over and out.

I understand the suspicion, but this seems pretty unreasonable. The arguments are scientific and credible. Or are you saying there isn’t a rise in people seeking help for problematic porn use?

There can be problematic porn use and bullshit government overreach hijacking an existing problem, both existing in parallel.

I’m not arguing against that, just drawing attention to what kind of ‘light’ they are given. It’s not like there are only two perspectives.