Maybe a bit irrelevant but why is the article calling it “China’s battery“? I feel like if the researchers were from any other countries academy of science, say France, the title would have simply been something like “scientists discover new ways for fireproof battery”. Maybe it’d say French scientists or so, but not simply “France’s battery”?

The man pages are also really dense. I agree with the author that for time efficiency LLM is better. Although optimal mode would be to feed it the man page and then ask the specific question.

What do you mean? FOSS? Open hardware or able to integrate with existing foss like home assistant?

For the latter, I’ve used ecowitt based weather stations myself. they’re very durable, give reliable data and came with a quality manual for not much money.

They come with an app but you can just decide not to use it, all the data is available on the device, hosted as a web server. It has good integrations with HA which is what I use for long term storage together with influxdb.

Without realizing why it was rejected. I don’t get it, why care so much about 3 lines of code where one np command was replaced by another…

Ooooh now I see why you linked the other news story

Why does the article not have a picture of the winner?

I think it’s worrisome because if hobbyist can do this, imagine what professionals with more time and money can do