Doesn’t matter, his base will guess what it means and eat it if he complains about it.

Idiot should’ve thought about having more normal issues and hobbies, like pedophilia.

“I did have affairs, one with a Russian bridge player who met me at bridge events, and one with a Russian nuclear physicist who I met through business activities,” he said.

Sounds like actual adults.

No, you would not

Piracy is usually free yeah but that really doesn’t count.

You are talking about the business extension that was already available everywhere, but it requires buying it. I haven’t looked into it but I haven’t seen anything saying it was free. The article is talking about Germany and the free version that Europe forced Microsoft to enable for everyone, even without a subscription - but only in Europe. That one is only one year.

It’s still hanging

https://youtu.be/9H1nwqjzVVc

No, it was a pun for “life” in the Sumerian original.

My first assumption giving them the benefit of the doubt would be that it’s a rhetorical question to point out that there is a proper response and the car should have been taught to do that instead. Even if a lot of actual drivers don’t know the answer.

The issue is with the initial search. They can only search after they have the warrant, and they allegedly made the arrest knowing they would find a gun, and then got the warrant, and then “found” the gun again.

Even if they claim that as long as they did find the gun, it means they were right - the problem is that, had they not known about the gun, they wouldn’t have had grounds to arrest him, and therefore they wouldn’t have a conviction. That sounds fine as long as you do find a murderer, but not for everyone else they search like that with no warrant.

Even assuming the gun was real and not planted, the legal issue is that they can’t be allowed to fish for anyone they want, even if they happen to land on the right guy - after countless other innocents. Forcing them to let an actual murderer free would, presumably, push them to think twice before violating random people’s rights.

And after that, they have to prove somehow that the gun wasn’t planted while they had the bag and the owner couldn’t check on them.

“A thing written by people can’t possibly be propaganda” lol okay.

The website.

You insist on “what is wrong in this article” .

One of the things that popaganda does is sprinkling some real stuff to attract new people and then slowly feed them more lies.

It doesn’t matter if you stumble upon a few good articles with real quotes - the whole thing must be avoided to reduce traffic in their direction. The proper response is to find a different source with the same quotes.

This is thinking critically. If you know it’s from a propagandist, don’t give them more food. Your version of “thinking critically” is just “listen to the people who sound more convincing, even you know they are liars and you can’t find if this specific article has lies or not” .

Define unwell. He and she are not talking about the same thing, he’s not agreeing with her, he’s muddying the water on what anyone is talking about.

Like “he’s committing genocide, he’s crazy” “but what about cinnamon rolls, that’s crazy too” is not him agreeing, it’s him changing the subject.

Not for the canary cry emoji

… To indiscriminately beat up anyone who’s not rich?

See: Israel, Hamas. Reuters: “this news camera is Hamas.”

What do you not understand about criminalizing anti-fascism as a concept?

Connecticut is Jewish?

And there’s additional hurdles for more targeted populations, like access to the place that gives you the ID, and the capacity to prove your ID to that place with specific documents that may ormay not exist. It’s on purpose.