That is what happens when I try to write a reply to an OP on my phone. Sorry!

Freddy Mercury, for sure.

Freddy Mercury for sure.

deleted by creator

Got you fooled, doesn’t he? He is not (that) confused, he is a criminal with zero scruples and near unlimited power who does seemingly random and idiotic things to manipulate markets and conditions in favour of his buddies and family.

Hahahaha… go fuck yourself, you miserable thief

The shah’s reign of terror was ended by the people of Iran, not by islamists. The islamists just coopted the revolution. Nobody wants the shah back.

And all that so a couch fucker could cosplay a “real man”.

And all that so big tech can spy on you better.

Judge for yourself: Amalia Freud (and her son)

Better get some new leaders then that don’t have their heads stuck up Trump’s arse.

Sounds like RokChip really needed to put their hand on that hot stove top to understand they’d get burned. Hope they learn their lesson and improve their handling of FOSS code in the future.

Hmm. My “socials”. What do they expect to find there? Oh right, probably this:

FUCK YOU, USA. Never coming back.

Could take a look at text books from the 1940s. Might have to brush up on their German, though.

An LLM trained on all books ever written would probably take romance novels, books by flat earthers, or even “Atlas Shrugged” as truth as much as current AIs consider all stack overflow comments to contain useful and accurate information.

Thinking about it, your questions comes back to the very first and original instance of a computer and the question interested people asked about it:

If you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answer come out?

Now if we allow ourselves the illusion of assuming that an AGI could exist, and that it can actually learn by itself in a similar way as humans, than just that quote above leads us to these two truths:

• LLMs cannot help being stupid, they just do not know any better.
• AGIs will probably be idiots, just like the humans asking the above question, but there is at least a chance that they will not.

Should not this person be standing in a utility cabinet with his head in a bucket, to be taken out and used whenever a floor needs sweeping? I estimate that would be his only shot at ever becoming useful at anything.

Between capabilities, namespaces, control groups, mandatory access control (AppArmor etc) and other mechanisms, I think there are plenty of ways to reduce user access to any part of the system.

Kernel undercarriage rust inhibitor.

There are some older Linux kernel developers who might actually be interested in that, too.

Anti antifa = pro fascism

Is this admitting now that they are straight up fascists?

It sounds futuristic

No, it just sounds stupid.