

The right wingers can say all they want to.
Relevant is only whether the judge listens to those right-wingers or uses their own eyes.
A Finn from a Finland.
I have the same username on, sopuli.xyz, anarchist.nexus, social.porotokka.net, piipitin.fi, piefed.social, lemmy.world, pixl.fi, divergent.1m2lab.engineer, piefed.ee, and bsky.app. Of those the ones on piipitin.fi and piefed.europe.pub are my main alts, and I use the ones on kbin.melroy.org and anarchist.nexus relatively often.


The right wingers can say all they want to.
Relevant is only whether the judge listens to those right-wingers or uses their own eyes.


They have enough evidence in the videos. Can’t the court just get it on with that evidence alone? It’s not as if there was anything terribly unclear about the case.


If there is one policemen arresting an ICE officer, the ICE officer is not allowed to resist the arrest. If there is one policemen arresting an ICE officer, surrounded by 20 ICE officers, none of the 20 ICE officers are allowed to resist the arrest.
And if they nevertheless do, that gets very interesting in court. Resisting an arrest is not a terribly good idea.
So, you’d promise that whoever brings you a sum of money, gets a lump of uranium? The more money brought, the bigger the lump? That would be kind of cool!